YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Pareto Principle in Scoping-Phase Cost Estimating: A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Selecting and Applying Optimal Major Work Items

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 008::page 04022076
    Author:
    Chau Le
    ,
    H. David Jeong
    ,
    Ivan Damnjanovic
    ,
    Satish Bukkapatnam
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002349
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Cost estimation is critical to a typical transportation project’s development process. Specifically, project owners use cost estimates during the scoping phase to set project budgets for funding approval and cost management. Because of the lack of detailed design, state transportation agency (STA) estimators often rely on the Pareto principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, in early cost estimating by estimating only high-impact work items and roughly calculating the costs of remaining items using a fixed percentage. However, it is a heuristic rule of thumb that does not apply to every scenario. Moreover, STAs’ guidance is minimal, and few studies have investigated the validity of this common practice. This study proposes two novel models that utilize well-established multiobjective optimization methods to automatically determine optimal major work items and necessary related information to apply the items to STAs’ scoping-phase estimating of new projects. A case study was conducted using an STA’s actual historical bid tabulation data for two project work types. The first model’s output shows that 10% and 20% of the work items can respectively contribute up to 92% and 97% of total project cost, and the cost contribution ratios vary with not only project work types but also projects under the same type, with coefficients of variance minimized simultaneously and calculated by the model. Because of the variance, mean or median measures can represent the center of cost percentages for estimating new projects’ total cost from major items’ costs. The second model’s results reveal that using the median is preferred because of lower expected errors. Also, using an optimal 10% item set and the median of its cost contribution ratios in past projects to estimate future projects results in the approach’s expected average error of 8.5%, which is acceptable in the scoping phase.
    • Download: (1.128Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Pareto Principle in Scoping-Phase Cost Estimating: A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Selecting and Applying Optimal Major Work Items

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286155
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChau Le
    contributor authorH. David Jeong
    contributor authorIvan Damnjanovic
    contributor authorSatish Bukkapatnam
    date accessioned2022-08-18T12:11:01Z
    date available2022-08-18T12:11:01Z
    date issued2022/06/15
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0002349.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4286155
    description abstractCost estimation is critical to a typical transportation project’s development process. Specifically, project owners use cost estimates during the scoping phase to set project budgets for funding approval and cost management. Because of the lack of detailed design, state transportation agency (STA) estimators often rely on the Pareto principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, in early cost estimating by estimating only high-impact work items and roughly calculating the costs of remaining items using a fixed percentage. However, it is a heuristic rule of thumb that does not apply to every scenario. Moreover, STAs’ guidance is minimal, and few studies have investigated the validity of this common practice. This study proposes two novel models that utilize well-established multiobjective optimization methods to automatically determine optimal major work items and necessary related information to apply the items to STAs’ scoping-phase estimating of new projects. A case study was conducted using an STA’s actual historical bid tabulation data for two project work types. The first model’s output shows that 10% and 20% of the work items can respectively contribute up to 92% and 97% of total project cost, and the cost contribution ratios vary with not only project work types but also projects under the same type, with coefficients of variance minimized simultaneously and calculated by the model. Because of the variance, mean or median measures can represent the center of cost percentages for estimating new projects’ total cost from major items’ costs. The second model’s results reveal that using the median is preferred because of lower expected errors. Also, using an optimal 10% item set and the median of its cost contribution ratios in past projects to estimate future projects results in the approach’s expected average error of 8.5%, which is acceptable in the scoping phase.
    publisherASCE
    titlePareto Principle in Scoping-Phase Cost Estimating: A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Selecting and Applying Optimal Major Work Items
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume148
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002349
    journal fristpage04022076
    journal lastpage04022076-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian