Show simple item record

contributor authorSigurdarson, Nökkvi S.
contributor authorEifler, Tobias
contributor authorEbro, Martin
contributor authorPapalambros, Panos Y.
date accessioned2022-05-08T08:25:41Z
date available2022-05-08T08:25:41Z
date copyright10/21/2021 12:00:00 AM
date issued2021
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_144_3_031704.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283914
description abstractMultiobjective design optimization studies typically derive Pareto sets or use a scalar substitute function to capture design trade-offs, leaving it up to the designer’s intuition to use this information for design refinements and decision-making. Understanding the causality of trade-offs more deeply, beyond simple postoptimality parametric studies, would be particularly valuable in configuration design problems to guide configuration redesign. This article presents the method of multiobjective monotonicity analysis to identify root causes for the existence of trade-offs and the particular shape of Pareto sets. This analysis process involves reducing optimization models through constraint activity identification to a point where dependencies specific to the Pareto set and the constraints that cause them are revealed. The insights gained can then be used to target configuration design changes. We demonstrate the proposed approach in the preliminary design of a medical device for oral drug delivery.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMultiobjective Monotonicity Analysis: Pareto Set Dependency and Trade-Offs Causality in Configuration Design
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4052444
journal fristpage31704-1
journal lastpage31704-13
page13
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2021:;volume( 144 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record