YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    CFD Simulations of Conical Central Baffle Flumes

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 002::page 06021014
    Author:
    Ankur Kapoor
    ,
    Aniruddha D. Ghare
    ,
    Avinash M. Badar
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001653
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Conical central baffle flumes present an effective solution for temporary flow measurements in open channels. A conical central baffle flume consists of a cone-shaped obstruction, or a central baffle, oriented vertically at the center of an open channel. In the present study, a previously developed discharge prediction model for flow measurements in open channels using the conical central baffle flumes has been experimentally recalibrated for use in rectangular and trapezoidal channels to cover a wider application range. The proposed calibration equation has been validated for an extended range of flow and geometrical parameters using the results of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations using Flow-3D. The simulation studies are carried out in two steps. The first step is the validation of the defined simulation problem set up by comparing the water surface profiles of the simulation and experiment flows for the same discharge and flow conditions. The second step is the validation of the proposed discharge prediction model for the extended range (0–0.50) of the dimensionless discharge and side slopes (m1=0, 0.50, 1.00, and 1.50). It is found that for submergence less than 80%, the error in discharge prediction is always less than 10% with a mean value of nearly 3%. Based on the results of the CFD analysis, the use of the calibrated discharge prediction model has been recommended up to a submergence limit of 80%, beyond which the errors are found to be greater than 10%.
    • Download: (1.479Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      CFD Simulations of Conical Central Baffle Flumes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283783
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAnkur Kapoor
    contributor authorAniruddha D. Ghare
    contributor authorAvinash M. Badar
    date accessioned2022-05-07T21:28:58Z
    date available2022-05-07T21:28:58Z
    date issued2021-12-11
    identifier other(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001653.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283783
    description abstractConical central baffle flumes present an effective solution for temporary flow measurements in open channels. A conical central baffle flume consists of a cone-shaped obstruction, or a central baffle, oriented vertically at the center of an open channel. In the present study, a previously developed discharge prediction model for flow measurements in open channels using the conical central baffle flumes has been experimentally recalibrated for use in rectangular and trapezoidal channels to cover a wider application range. The proposed calibration equation has been validated for an extended range of flow and geometrical parameters using the results of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations using Flow-3D. The simulation studies are carried out in two steps. The first step is the validation of the defined simulation problem set up by comparing the water surface profiles of the simulation and experiment flows for the same discharge and flow conditions. The second step is the validation of the proposed discharge prediction model for the extended range (0–0.50) of the dimensionless discharge and side slopes (m1=0, 0.50, 1.00, and 1.50). It is found that for submergence less than 80%, the error in discharge prediction is always less than 10% with a mean value of nearly 3%. Based on the results of the CFD analysis, the use of the calibrated discharge prediction model has been recommended up to a submergence limit of 80%, beyond which the errors are found to be greater than 10%.
    publisherASCE
    titleCFD Simulations of Conical Central Baffle Flumes
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001653
    journal fristpage06021014
    journal lastpage06021014-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian