Visibility of Winter Operations Vehicles: The State of Practice in the United StatesSource: Journal of Cold Regions Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 002::page 06022003DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000274Publisher: ASCE
Abstract: Despite precautions taken by the operators of maintenance vehicles, insufficient visibility of winter operations vehicles causes many collisions in the United States. Numerous methods have been developed to enhance the visibility of winter operations vehicles. Although these methods have improved the visibility of winter operations vehicles, information regarding the current state of practice of these methods is crucial for the safety of winter operations vehicles, and commuters. For safer winter operations, it is critical to investigate the differences, similarities, and challenges associated with the existing methods for enhancing the visibility of winter operations. This research examines the differences, similarities, and challenges associated with these methods using a survey to collect information from state transportation agencies. Questionnaire distribution included all 50 states to investigate patterns among the states and 25 Texas Dept. of Transportation (TxDOT) districts to gather the state of practice of the operations vehicles’ visibility methods. Results of the survey brought forward the inefficiencies of some current visibility methods. For example, rear airfoils were reported to be ineffective, while many state DOTs use and maintain the airfoils despite the inefficiencies. Although a wide range of dissimilarities was found in the use of message signs and retroreflective markings, they are reported to be inexpensive and effective. It is expected that the findings of this study help transportation agencies implement more effective methods for enhancing the visibility of winter operations vehicles.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Wasiq Ameen | |
contributor author | Ferika Farooghi | |
contributor author | Mohsen Shahandashti | |
contributor author | Stephen Mattingly | |
date accessioned | 2022-05-07T20:58:25Z | |
date available | 2022-05-07T20:58:25Z | |
date issued | 2022-6-1 | |
identifier other | (ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000274.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4283139 | |
description abstract | Despite precautions taken by the operators of maintenance vehicles, insufficient visibility of winter operations vehicles causes many collisions in the United States. Numerous methods have been developed to enhance the visibility of winter operations vehicles. Although these methods have improved the visibility of winter operations vehicles, information regarding the current state of practice of these methods is crucial for the safety of winter operations vehicles, and commuters. For safer winter operations, it is critical to investigate the differences, similarities, and challenges associated with the existing methods for enhancing the visibility of winter operations. This research examines the differences, similarities, and challenges associated with these methods using a survey to collect information from state transportation agencies. Questionnaire distribution included all 50 states to investigate patterns among the states and 25 Texas Dept. of Transportation (TxDOT) districts to gather the state of practice of the operations vehicles’ visibility methods. Results of the survey brought forward the inefficiencies of some current visibility methods. For example, rear airfoils were reported to be ineffective, while many state DOTs use and maintain the airfoils despite the inefficiencies. Although a wide range of dissimilarities was found in the use of message signs and retroreflective markings, they are reported to be inexpensive and effective. It is expected that the findings of this study help transportation agencies implement more effective methods for enhancing the visibility of winter operations vehicles. | |
publisher | ASCE | |
title | Visibility of Winter Operations Vehicles: The State of Practice in the United States | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 36 | |
journal issue | 2 | |
journal title | Journal of Cold Regions Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000274 | |
journal fristpage | 06022003 | |
journal lastpage | 06022003-7 | |
page | 7 | |
tree | Journal of Cold Regions Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 002 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |