YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Full-Scale Cross-Laminated Timber Diaphragm Evaluation. I: Design and Full-Scale Diaphragm Testing

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 005::page 04022037
    Author:
    Philip Line
    ,
    Scott Nyseth
    ,
    Ned Waltz
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003308
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The objective of this study was to monotonically test two 7.32×7.32-m (24×24-ft) cross-laminated timber (CLT) diaphragms designed using the provisions of ANSI/AWC 2021 (AWC. 2021. Special design provisions for wind and seismic. ANSI/AWC SDPWS-2021, Leesburg, VA: AWC). Each diaphragm used twelve 1.22×3.66-m (4×12-ft) CLT panels and plywood splines or glulam beams at panel shear connection locations. Diaphragms were tested in simple-span bending in general accordance with ASTM E455 (ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for static load testing of framed floor and roof diaphragm constructions for buildings. ASTM E455-2017. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM), used 8d common [3.3×63.5-mm (0.131×2.5-in.)] nails for panel-to-panel spline connections used proprietary 7.9×200-mm (5/16×7-7/8-in.) screws for panel-to-beam connections. The calculated allowable seismic shear design capacity for both configurations, based on the panel shear connections, was 60.5 kN (13.6 kips) per reaction. The diaphragm tested with load applied parallel to the long dimension of the CLT panels failed due to spline nail withdrawal at 4.0 times the allowable seismic design capacity. The diaphragm tested in the orthogonal orientation did not fail at the safe working capacity of the steel test frame, which was 6.0 times the allowable seismic design capacity. Although this testing provided empirical verification that the SDPWS design provisions met the minimum strength target underlying the design requirements, it also identified opportunities for potential future research to reduce design conservatism. Experimental results from a series of diaphragm connection tests correlated to the connections used in the full-scale diaphragm testing are described in the Part 2 companion study (Line et al., forthcoming).
    • Download: (2.412Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Full-Scale Cross-Laminated Timber Diaphragm Evaluation. I: Design and Full-Scale Diaphragm Testing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282445
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPhilip Line
    contributor authorScott Nyseth
    contributor authorNed Waltz
    date accessioned2022-05-07T20:26:54Z
    date available2022-05-07T20:26:54Z
    date issued2022-03-04
    identifier other(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003308.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282445
    description abstractThe objective of this study was to monotonically test two 7.32×7.32-m (24×24-ft) cross-laminated timber (CLT) diaphragms designed using the provisions of ANSI/AWC 2021 (AWC. 2021. Special design provisions for wind and seismic. ANSI/AWC SDPWS-2021, Leesburg, VA: AWC). Each diaphragm used twelve 1.22×3.66-m (4×12-ft) CLT panels and plywood splines or glulam beams at panel shear connection locations. Diaphragms were tested in simple-span bending in general accordance with ASTM E455 (ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for static load testing of framed floor and roof diaphragm constructions for buildings. ASTM E455-2017. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM), used 8d common [3.3×63.5-mm (0.131×2.5-in.)] nails for panel-to-panel spline connections used proprietary 7.9×200-mm (5/16×7-7/8-in.) screws for panel-to-beam connections. The calculated allowable seismic shear design capacity for both configurations, based on the panel shear connections, was 60.5 kN (13.6 kips) per reaction. The diaphragm tested with load applied parallel to the long dimension of the CLT panels failed due to spline nail withdrawal at 4.0 times the allowable seismic design capacity. The diaphragm tested in the orthogonal orientation did not fail at the safe working capacity of the steel test frame, which was 6.0 times the allowable seismic design capacity. Although this testing provided empirical verification that the SDPWS design provisions met the minimum strength target underlying the design requirements, it also identified opportunities for potential future research to reduce design conservatism. Experimental results from a series of diaphragm connection tests correlated to the connections used in the full-scale diaphragm testing are described in the Part 2 companion study (Line et al., forthcoming).
    publisherASCE
    titleFull-Scale Cross-Laminated Timber Diaphragm Evaluation. I: Design and Full-Scale Diaphragm Testing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume148
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003308
    journal fristpage04022037
    journal lastpage04022037-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 148 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian