YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Soil Abutment Wall: A Physical Modeling

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003::page 04021495
    Author:
    Foad Changizi
    ,
    Arash Razmkhah
    ,
    Hasan Ghasemzadeh
    ,
    Masoud Amelsakhi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004132
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The use of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) structures instead of pile foundation in bridge abutment walls leads to reduction in costs and bridge bump. This study evaluates the effect of geocell as reinforcement on the bearing capacity of the backfill soil, the footing settlement, and the horizontal displacement of the wall facing of the GRS abutment wall. For this purpose, through physical modeling of the abutment wall and strip footing on backfill soil, a series of tests was carried out with changes in the value of the parameters such as the diameter of an equivalent circular area of the geocell pocket opening, the number of geocell layers, and the distance of backfill soil surface to the first layer of geocell. The output of the experiments showed that the increase in the diameter of an equivalent circular area of the geocell pocket opening results in greater horizontal displacement of the wall facing and reduction in bearing capacity of GRS abutment wall. Also, the best performance of the geocell-reinforced soil wall can be seen when the distance of the backfill soil surface to the first layer of geocell was 0.1 times the footing width. Increase in the numbers of geocell layers leads to increase in the bearing capacity of footing and the optimal number of geocell layers as reinforcement depended on the amount of pressure applied to the abutment wall. The results show that the optimum number of geocell layers as reinforcement for the footing pressures of 156, 188, and 205 kPa were four, five, and six, respectively. Also, the results showed that the abutment wall facing was deformed in the form of bulging and the rotation outward.
    • Download: (3.064Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Soil Abutment Wall: A Physical Modeling

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282007
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFoad Changizi
    contributor authorArash Razmkhah
    contributor authorHasan Ghasemzadeh
    contributor authorMasoud Amelsakhi
    date accessioned2022-05-07T20:07:03Z
    date available2022-05-07T20:07:03Z
    date issued2021-12-31
    identifier other(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004132.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282007
    description abstractThe use of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) structures instead of pile foundation in bridge abutment walls leads to reduction in costs and bridge bump. This study evaluates the effect of geocell as reinforcement on the bearing capacity of the backfill soil, the footing settlement, and the horizontal displacement of the wall facing of the GRS abutment wall. For this purpose, through physical modeling of the abutment wall and strip footing on backfill soil, a series of tests was carried out with changes in the value of the parameters such as the diameter of an equivalent circular area of the geocell pocket opening, the number of geocell layers, and the distance of backfill soil surface to the first layer of geocell. The output of the experiments showed that the increase in the diameter of an equivalent circular area of the geocell pocket opening results in greater horizontal displacement of the wall facing and reduction in bearing capacity of GRS abutment wall. Also, the best performance of the geocell-reinforced soil wall can be seen when the distance of the backfill soil surface to the first layer of geocell was 0.1 times the footing width. Increase in the numbers of geocell layers leads to increase in the bearing capacity of footing and the optimal number of geocell layers as reinforcement depended on the amount of pressure applied to the abutment wall. The results show that the optimum number of geocell layers as reinforcement for the footing pressures of 156, 188, and 205 kPa were four, five, and six, respectively. Also, the results showed that the abutment wall facing was deformed in the form of bulging and the rotation outward.
    publisherASCE
    titleBehavior of Geocell-Reinforced Soil Abutment Wall: A Physical Modeling
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004132
    journal fristpage04021495
    journal lastpage04021495-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian