YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Integrated Framework for Quantifying and Applying Nonworking Days to Planning and Scheduling for Determining Reasonable Construction Time

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 038 ):;issue: 004::page 04022023
    Author:
    Jongsik Yoon
    ,
    Kyungrai Kim
    ,
    Byungjoo Choi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001054
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Determining a reasonable construction time (RCT) is crucial in project planning and schedule management. Construction projects are exposed to the external environment, including rainfall, extreme temperatures, snowfall, and high wind speed, and the RCT should be evaluated considering these risks. The risks can be reflected by activity duration using nonworking days (NWDs). However, current construction planning and scheduling practices are ineffective for dealing with of NWD characteristics because working days (WDs) and NWDs are mixed in most schedule performance data used for schedule development. Activity durations estimated using historical performance data may not appropriately reflect the activity characteristics (work type, region, and work timing), leading to an unreasonable construction time for a project. Here, we propose an activity duration segmentation method (ADSM) for determining the RCT. The ADSM can evaluate the combined effects of weather factors according to work type and determine the operation rate, which depends on start date, work type, region, and activity duration. This leads to the separation of WDs and NWDs for determining the RCT. Case-based and comparative analyses were conducted to validate the proposed method. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), used to validate the ADSM, was 5.79%. The results of the present study show that NWDs can be determined by considering the characteristics of the various activities (e.g., sensitivities toward environmental conditions, start date) and the environmental conditions of the project (weather conditions at the project location, working hour patterns). The ADSM suggests an integrated framework for combining activity characteristics and project environmental conditions when determining NWDs of each activity. The ADSM can be used by project owners for determining the RCT or the contract time, which varies according to activity characteristics. Also, a construction scheduler can assess to what extent the construction schedule will be influenced by NWDs.
    • Download: (2.045Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Integrated Framework for Quantifying and Applying Nonworking Days to Planning and Scheduling for Determining Reasonable Construction Time

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4281869
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJongsik Yoon
    contributor authorKyungrai Kim
    contributor authorByungjoo Choi
    date accessioned2022-05-07T19:58:58Z
    date available2022-05-07T19:58:58Z
    date issued2022-03-25
    identifier other(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001054.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4281869
    description abstractDetermining a reasonable construction time (RCT) is crucial in project planning and schedule management. Construction projects are exposed to the external environment, including rainfall, extreme temperatures, snowfall, and high wind speed, and the RCT should be evaluated considering these risks. The risks can be reflected by activity duration using nonworking days (NWDs). However, current construction planning and scheduling practices are ineffective for dealing with of NWD characteristics because working days (WDs) and NWDs are mixed in most schedule performance data used for schedule development. Activity durations estimated using historical performance data may not appropriately reflect the activity characteristics (work type, region, and work timing), leading to an unreasonable construction time for a project. Here, we propose an activity duration segmentation method (ADSM) for determining the RCT. The ADSM can evaluate the combined effects of weather factors according to work type and determine the operation rate, which depends on start date, work type, region, and activity duration. This leads to the separation of WDs and NWDs for determining the RCT. Case-based and comparative analyses were conducted to validate the proposed method. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), used to validate the ADSM, was 5.79%. The results of the present study show that NWDs can be determined by considering the characteristics of the various activities (e.g., sensitivities toward environmental conditions, start date) and the environmental conditions of the project (weather conditions at the project location, working hour patterns). The ADSM suggests an integrated framework for combining activity characteristics and project environmental conditions when determining NWDs of each activity. The ADSM can be used by project owners for determining the RCT or the contract time, which varies according to activity characteristics. Also, a construction scheduler can assess to what extent the construction schedule will be influenced by NWDs.
    publisherASCE
    titleIntegrated Framework for Quantifying and Applying Nonworking Days to Planning and Scheduling for Determining Reasonable Construction Time
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume38
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001054
    journal fristpage04022023
    journal lastpage04022023-16
    page16
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2022:;Volume ( 038 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian