YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Regulatory Framework around Data Governance and External Benchmarking

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2022:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 002::page 04522006
    Author:
    Vivek Sharma
    ,
    Ehsan Mousavi
    ,
    Dhaval Gajjar
    ,
    Kapil Madathil
    ,
    Chris Smith
    ,
    Nathan Matos
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000526
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Regulatory compliance is a set of formal requirements, and lack of clarity on regulations can lead to significant legal and ethical consequences pertaining to collection, storage, or sharing of data among organizations. It can create ambiguity, or regulatory gaps around external benchmark frameworks employed to measure and compare performance among participating organizations. The purpose of this study is to review current US laws and regulations and governing case law concerning data governance, and to aid examination of the framework of federal antitrust and Safe Harbor rules around benchmarking and data warehousing. This study explores gaps between academic research and formal requirements for data governance and benchmarking in the federal space. A systematic review of the literature, federal laws, agency regulations, and relevant case law was conducted to further organize the relevance of the literature in the academic, federal, and legal domains. A quantitative approach was adopted wherein academic scores of relevance (SoR), a legislative score of relevance (LoR), and an overall ranked score of relevance (RoR) were calculated. Guidance on business implications around data governance frameworks is provided to academic and industry professionals engaged in data sharing and analytics.
    • Download: (280.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Regulatory Framework around Data Governance and External Benchmarking

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4281770
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVivek Sharma
    contributor authorEhsan Mousavi
    contributor authorDhaval Gajjar
    contributor authorKapil Madathil
    contributor authorChris Smith
    contributor authorNathan Matos
    date accessioned2022-05-07T19:52:48Z
    date available2022-05-07T19:52:48Z
    date issued2022-02-14
    identifier other(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000526.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4281770
    description abstractRegulatory compliance is a set of formal requirements, and lack of clarity on regulations can lead to significant legal and ethical consequences pertaining to collection, storage, or sharing of data among organizations. It can create ambiguity, or regulatory gaps around external benchmark frameworks employed to measure and compare performance among participating organizations. The purpose of this study is to review current US laws and regulations and governing case law concerning data governance, and to aid examination of the framework of federal antitrust and Safe Harbor rules around benchmarking and data warehousing. This study explores gaps between academic research and formal requirements for data governance and benchmarking in the federal space. A systematic review of the literature, federal laws, agency regulations, and relevant case law was conducted to further organize the relevance of the literature in the academic, federal, and legal domains. A quantitative approach was adopted wherein academic scores of relevance (SoR), a legislative score of relevance (LoR), and an overall ranked score of relevance (RoR) were calculated. Guidance on business implications around data governance frameworks is provided to academic and industry professionals engaged in data sharing and analytics.
    publisherASCE
    titleRegulatory Framework around Data Governance and External Benchmarking
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume14
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000526
    journal fristpage04522006
    journal lastpage04522006-14
    page14
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2022:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian