Show simple item record

contributor authorYocum, Derek
contributor authorReinbolt, Jeffrey
contributor authorWeinhandl, Joshua T.
contributor authorStandifird, Tyler W.
contributor authorFitzhugh, Eugene
contributor authorCates, Harold
contributor authorZhang, Songning
date accessioned2022-02-06T05:37:50Z
date available2022-02-06T05:37:50Z
date copyright7/19/2021 12:00:00 AM
date issued2021
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_143_11_111003.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278430
description abstractMany unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) patients will need a contralateral TKR. Differences in knee joint biomechanics between bilateral patients and unilateral patients are not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine knee joint differences in level walking between bilateral and unilateral patients, and asymptomatic controls, using principal component analysis. Knee joints of 1st replaced limbs of 15 bilateral patients (69.40 ± 5.04 years), 15 replaced limbs of unilateral patients (66.47 ± 6.15 years), and 15 asymptomatic controls (63.53 ± 9.50 years) were analyzed during level walking. Principal component analysis examined knee joint sagittal- and frontal-plane kinematics and moments, and vertical ground reaction force (GRF). A one-way analysis of variance analyzed differences between principal component scores of each group. TKR patients exhibited more flexed and abducted knees throughout stance, decreased sagittal knee range of motion (ROM), increased early-stance adduction ROM, decreased loading-response knee extension and push-off knee flexion moments, decreased loading-response and push-off peak knee abduction moment (KAbM), increased KAbM at midstance, increased midstance vertical GRF, and decreased loading-response and push-off vertical GRF. Additionally, bilateral patients exhibited reduced sagittal knee ROM, increased adduction ROM, decreased sagittal knee moments throughout stance, decreased KAbM throughout stance, an earlier loading-response peak vertical GRF, and a decreased push-off vertical GRF, compared to unilateral patients. TKR patients, especially bilateral patients had stiff knee motion in the sagittal-plane, increased frontal-plane joint laxity, and a quadriceps avoidance gait.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titlePrincipal Component Analysis of Knee Joint Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Total Knee Replacement Patients During Level Walking
typeJournal Paper
journal volume143
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4051524
journal fristpage0111003-1
journal lastpage0111003-12
page12
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record