Show simple item record

contributor authorPark, Chanyoung
contributor authorNili, Samaun
contributor authorMathew, Justin T.
contributor authorOuellet, Frederick
contributor authorKoneru, Rahul
contributor authorKim, Nam H.
contributor authorBalachandar, Sivaramakrishnan
contributor authorHaftka, Raphael T.
date accessioned2022-02-06T05:25:50Z
date available2022-02-06T05:25:50Z
date copyright7/6/2021 12:00:00 AM
date issued2021
identifier issn2377-2158
identifier othervvuq_006_03_031004.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4278011
description abstractUncertainty quantification (UQ) is an important step in the verification and validation of scientific computing. Validation can be inconclusive when uncertainties are larger than acceptable ranges for both simulation and experiment. Therefore, uncertainty reduction (UR) is important to achieve meaningful validation. A unique approach in this paper is to separate model error from uncertainty such that UR can reveal the model error. This paper aims to share lessons learned from UQ and UR of a horizontal shock tube simulation, whose goal is to validate the particle drag force model for the compressible multiphase flow. First, simulation UQ revealed the inconsistency in simulation predictions due to the numerical flux scheme, which was clearly shown using the parametric design of experiments. By improving the numerical flux scheme, the uncertainty due to inconsistency was removed, while increasing the overall prediction error. Second, the mismatch between the geometry of the experiments and the simplified 1D simulation model was identified as a lack of knowledge. After modifying simulation conditions and experiments, it turned out that the error due to the mismatch was small, which was unexpected based on expert opinions. Last, the uncertainty in the initial volume fraction of particles was reduced based on rigorous UQ. All these UR measures worked together to reveal the hidden modeling error in the simulation predictions, which can lead to a model improvement in the future. We summarized the lessons learned from this exercise in terms of empty success, useful failure, and deceptive success.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleUncertainty Reduction for Model Error Detection in Multiphase Shock Tube Simulation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume6
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
identifier doi10.1115/1.4051407
journal fristpage031004-1
journal lastpage031004-10
page10
treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2021:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record