Show simple item record

contributor authorBair, Scott
contributor authorHabchi, Wassim
date accessioned2022-02-05T22:03:21Z
date available2022-02-05T22:03:21Z
date copyright2/2/2021 12:00:00 AM
date issued2021
identifier issn0742-4787
identifier othertrib_143_8_081601.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4276825
description abstractThe concentrated contact formed between a steel ball and a glass disc—the optical elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHD) rig—has been the primary instrument for experimental investigations of elastohydrodynamic film thickness. It has been a source for values of pressure-viscosity coefficient, a difficult-to-define property of liquids. However, comparisons with the pressure dependence of the viscosity obtained in viscometers show little agreement. There are multiple reasons for this failure including shear-thinning and compressibility of the oil. Another reason for the poor agreement is the subject of this short note. The optical EHD rig using glass as one surface will only be in the piezoviscous-elastic (EHD) regime when the pressure-viscosity coefficient is large. For low values, it would be operating in the isoviscous-elastic regime (soft EHD).
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleYour EHD Rig May Not Be As Elastohydrodynamic As You Think
typeJournal Paper
journal volume143
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Tribology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4049592
journal fristpage081601-1
journal lastpage081601-5
page5
treeJournal of Tribology:;2021:;volume( 143 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record