| contributor author | Oberkampf, William L. | |
| contributor author | Balch, Michael S. | |
| date accessioned | 2022-02-04T22:24:09Z | |
| date available | 2022-02-04T22:24:09Z | |
| date copyright | 10/5/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
| date issued | 2020 | |
| identifier issn | 2377-2158 | |
| identifier other | vvuq_005_03_035501.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275493 | |
| description abstract | This comment repudiates these bold claims made by Hazelrigg and Klutke. It is divided into four topics; interpretation of probability, uncertainty of probability, model validation, and advanced UQ frameworks.The Discussion Article cited is extraordinary from several perspectives. It | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Closure on the Discussion of “Models, Uncertainty, and the Sandia V&V Challenge Problem” (Hazelrigg, G. A., and Klutke, G. A., ASME J. Verif. Valid. Uncert., 2020, 5(1), p. 015501) | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 5 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4048338 | |
| journal fristpage | 035501-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 035501-3 | |
| page | 3 | |
| tree | Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2020:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
