Show simple item record

contributor authorRakhsha, Milad
contributor authorKelly, Conlain
contributor authorOlsen, Nic
contributor authorSerban, Radu
contributor authorNegrut, Dan
date accessioned2022-02-04T22:20:09Z
date available2022-02-04T22:20:09Z
date copyright7/16/2020 12:00:00 AM
date issued2020
identifier issn1555-1415
identifier othercnd_015_09_091009.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4275362
description abstractConsidering that granular material is second only to water in how often it is handled in practical applications, characterizing its dynamics represents a ubiquitous problem. However, studying the motion of granular material poses stiff computational challenges. The underlying question in this contribution is whether a continuum representation of the granular material, established in the framework of the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method, can provide a good proxy for the fully resolved granular dynamics solution. To this end, two approaches described herein were implemented to run on graphics processing unit (GPU) cards to solve the three-dimensional (3D) dynamics of the granular material via two solution methods: a discrete one, and a continuum one. The study concentrates on the case when the granular material is packed but shows fluid-like behavior under large strains. On the one hand, we solve the Newton–Euler equations of motion to fully resolve the motion of the granular system. On the other hand, we solve the Navier–Stokes equations to describe the evolution of the granular material when treated as a homogenized continuum. To demonstrate the similarities and differences between the multibody and fluid dynamics, we consider three representative problems: (i) a compressibility test (highlighting a static case); (ii) the classical dam break problem (highlighting high transients); and (iii) the dam break simulation with an obstacle (highlighting impact). These experiments provide insights into conditions under which one can expect similar macroscale behavior from multibody and fluid dynamics systems governed by manifestly different equations of motion and solved by vastly different numerical solution methods. The models and simulation platform used are publicly available and part of an open source code called Chrono. Timing results are reported to gauge the efficiency gains associated with treating the granular material as a continuum.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMultibody Dynamics Versus Fluid Dynamics: Two Perspectives on the Dynamics of Granular Flows
typeJournal Paper
journal volume15
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics
identifier doi10.1115/1.4047237
journal fristpage091009-1
journal lastpage091009-10
page10
treeJournal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics:;2020:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record