Show simple item record

contributor authorRoy, Ashutosh
contributor authorSista, Bhargava
contributor authorVemaganti, Kumar
date accessioned2022-02-04T14:23:02Z
date available2022-02-04T14:23:02Z
date copyright2020/05/18/
date issued2020
identifier issn0742-4787
identifier othertrib_142_10_101501.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4273550
description abstractThe complexity of modeling friction between rough surfaces has prompted many researchers to use Greenwood and Tripp’s sum surface assumption to simplify the analysis. This assumption approximates the contact between two rough surfaces as contact between their equivalent sum surface and a rigid plane. In this work, we develop detailed finite element models to test the sum surface assumption for surfaces with Gaussian and exponential autocorrelation functions. We consider surfaces with differing surface roughness and correlation length values. For each case, we conduct simulations of two rough surfaces interacting in compression followed by shear, and a corresponding equivalent surface model based on the sum surface assumption. Multiple realizations of each parameter combination are simulated to obtain a statistical picture of the responses. We find that (a) the sum surface assumption consistently under-predicts the static coefficient of friction and (b) the equivalent surface model is less accurate for surfaces with differing correlation length-to-surface roughness ratios.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleTesting the Validity of Greenwood and Tripp’s Sum Surface Assumption for Elastic-Plastic Contact
typeJournal Paper
journal volume142
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Tribology
identifier doi10.1115/1.4046875
page101501
treeJournal of Tribology:;2020:;volume( 142 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record