YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Thrust Restraint of Buried Continuous Pressure Pipe Considering Pipe–Soil Interaction

    Source: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2021:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 004::page 04021039-1
    Author:
    Meng Liu
    ,
    Rafael Ortega
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000577
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Design and analysis of thrust restraint for a buried continuous pressure pipe is essentially a pipe–soil interaction (PSI) problem regardless of pipe materials and restraint methods. In practice, thrust block and restrained joints are the most commonly used restraint methods, and dual restraint systems using both methods can be found in many pipeline projects even though they are treated independently. However, no analytical procedure is available to analyze the performance of such dual restraint systems. Therefore, a closed-form linear-elastic solution considering PSI is proposed to analyze pipes restrained with both thrust blocks and restrained joints or continuous pipes restrained with thrust blocks. The solution also considers the contribution of friction resistance due to increased normal pressure at the pipe–soil interface, as the pipe moves laterally into and longitudinally through soils simultaneously. The solution can be easily implemented by hand-calculation or a spreadsheet for various pipe material, geometry, and soil stiffness. The example provided demonstrates that the current guideline procedure overestimates the restraint length and underestimates the axial force slightly because the frictional resistance from lateral pipe movement is neglected. A comprehensive parametric study has been conducted to illustrate the effects of different design parameters on the internal forces, displacements, and restraint length of pipes. It is found that soil stiffness is the most critical parameter in resisting thrust force.
    • Download: (661.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Thrust Restraint of Buried Continuous Pressure Pipe Considering Pipe–Soil Interaction

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272661
    Collections
    • Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMeng Liu
    contributor authorRafael Ortega
    date accessioned2022-02-01T22:07:28Z
    date available2022-02-01T22:07:28Z
    date issued11/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29PS.1949-1204.0000577.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272661
    description abstractDesign and analysis of thrust restraint for a buried continuous pressure pipe is essentially a pipe–soil interaction (PSI) problem regardless of pipe materials and restraint methods. In practice, thrust block and restrained joints are the most commonly used restraint methods, and dual restraint systems using both methods can be found in many pipeline projects even though they are treated independently. However, no analytical procedure is available to analyze the performance of such dual restraint systems. Therefore, a closed-form linear-elastic solution considering PSI is proposed to analyze pipes restrained with both thrust blocks and restrained joints or continuous pipes restrained with thrust blocks. The solution also considers the contribution of friction resistance due to increased normal pressure at the pipe–soil interface, as the pipe moves laterally into and longitudinally through soils simultaneously. The solution can be easily implemented by hand-calculation or a spreadsheet for various pipe material, geometry, and soil stiffness. The example provided demonstrates that the current guideline procedure overestimates the restraint length and underestimates the axial force slightly because the frictional resistance from lateral pipe movement is neglected. A comprehensive parametric study has been conducted to illustrate the effects of different design parameters on the internal forces, displacements, and restraint length of pipes. It is found that soil stiffness is the most critical parameter in resisting thrust force.
    publisherASCE
    titleThrust Restraint of Buried Continuous Pressure Pipe Considering Pipe–Soil Interaction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume12
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000577
    journal fristpage04021039-1
    journal lastpage04021039-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice:;2021:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian