Shear Friction and Strut-and-Tie Modeling Verification for Pier CapsSource: Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 009::page 04021059-1DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001758Publisher: ASCE
Abstract: This study reports on experimental test results of reinforced concrete pier caps with different shear spans to effective depth ratios (a/d) of 0.5, 1, and 1.5. Each test specimen is then designed theoretically using both shear friction (SF) and strut-and-tie modeling (STM) approaches, according to Section 16.5 and Chapter 23 of ACI 318-14, respectively, and the results are compared with the pier caps experimental test results. The cracking load, failure load, deflection, crack pattern, crack width, steel reinforcement strains, concrete surface average strains, and failure modes are observed, recorded, and discussed. The experimental load capacities are compared with the theoretical load capacities of SF and STM. Experimental test results indicate that both STM and SF are conservative approaches and STM is more conservative than SF. The reason for this is because they do not take secondary reinforcement into direct consideration. That is why, a model is proposed, modifying STM, for estimating the ultimate capacity of pier caps based on calculating the strength of concrete and secondary reinforcement separately that gave more realistic results.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Asala Asaad Dawood | |
contributor author | Khattab Saleem Abdul-Razzaq | |
date accessioned | 2022-02-01T22:02:40Z | |
date available | 2022-02-01T22:02:40Z | |
date issued | 9/1/2021 | |
identifier other | %28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001758.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272504 | |
description abstract | This study reports on experimental test results of reinforced concrete pier caps with different shear spans to effective depth ratios (a/d) of 0.5, 1, and 1.5. Each test specimen is then designed theoretically using both shear friction (SF) and strut-and-tie modeling (STM) approaches, according to Section 16.5 and Chapter 23 of ACI 318-14, respectively, and the results are compared with the pier caps experimental test results. The cracking load, failure load, deflection, crack pattern, crack width, steel reinforcement strains, concrete surface average strains, and failure modes are observed, recorded, and discussed. The experimental load capacities are compared with the theoretical load capacities of SF and STM. Experimental test results indicate that both STM and SF are conservative approaches and STM is more conservative than SF. The reason for this is because they do not take secondary reinforcement into direct consideration. That is why, a model is proposed, modifying STM, for estimating the ultimate capacity of pier caps based on calculating the strength of concrete and secondary reinforcement separately that gave more realistic results. | |
publisher | ASCE | |
title | Shear Friction and Strut-and-Tie Modeling Verification for Pier Caps | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 26 | |
journal issue | 9 | |
journal title | Journal of Bridge Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001758 | |
journal fristpage | 04021059-1 | |
journal lastpage | 04021059-13 | |
page | 13 | |
tree | Journal of Bridge Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 009 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |