YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Differences of the Pore Structure and Methane Adsorption/Desorption between Vitrain and Durain of Low-Rank Coals: Case Study in the Huanglong Coalfield, Southern Ordos Basin, China

    Source: Journal of Energy Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 005::page 04021038-1
    Author:
    Yue Chen
    ,
    Hongyi Fu
    ,
    Dongmin Ma
    ,
    Zhonghui Duan
    ,
    Yuping Zhang
    ,
    Fu Yang
    ,
    Weibo Li
    ,
    Chao Zheng
    ,
    Jinxiang Teng
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000784
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Coal reservoirs are highly heterogeneous, and different macrolithotypes of coal have differences in material composition and pore structure, resulting in different coalbed methane (CBM) adsorption/desorption performance and gas-water migration characteristics. In order to explore the pore development characteristics of different macrolithotypes in low-rank coal and their influence on adsorption and desorption, the low-rank coal of the Yan’an Formation in the Huanglong coalfield is taken as the sample of the research object. Vitrain and durain are collected and then separated. The results show that the porosity of coal is 2.92%–11.81%, and the total porosity is relatively developed. The porosity of durain is slightly higher than that of vitrain, the pore throat of durain is thicker, and the macropores are more developed. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area (SSA) and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) total pore volume (TPV) of vitrain is slightly larger than durain, the micropores are more developed, and most of them are semiclosed and ink-bottle-shaped pores. The pore-fracture connectivity of the durain is better than vitrain via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Vitrain has more developed micropores than durain, with larger specific surface area and stronger adsorption capacity. In the process of methane adsorption/desorption, the phenomenon of desorption hysteresis generally exists. Moreover, the pore connectivity of durain is relatively good, the degree of desorption hysteresis is weaker than vitrain, and the theoretical desorption efficiency is higher than vitrain. Temperature has a significant influence on adsorption and desorption of methane. The increase in temperature is beneficial to desorption and weakens the hysteresis effect of desorption. At the same temperature, the isosteric adsorption heat in the desorption process is greater than the adsorption process, which further explains the incomplete reversibility of the adsorption and desorption process. Under the same conditions, the isosteric adsorption heat of vitrain in the adsorption process is greater than durain, and adsorption capacity of vitrain is stronger than durain. Similarly, the isosteric adsorption heat of vitrain in the desorption process is greater than durain, and desorption needs to absorb more heat. The desorption capacity is weaker than durain.
    • Download: (6.326Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Differences of the Pore Structure and Methane Adsorption/Desorption between Vitrain and Durain of Low-Rank Coals: Case Study in the Huanglong Coalfield, Southern Ordos Basin, China

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272174
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYue Chen
    contributor authorHongyi Fu
    contributor authorDongmin Ma
    contributor authorZhonghui Duan
    contributor authorYuping Zhang
    contributor authorFu Yang
    contributor authorWeibo Li
    contributor authorChao Zheng
    contributor authorJinxiang Teng
    date accessioned2022-02-01T21:51:31Z
    date available2022-02-01T21:51:31Z
    date issued10/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29EY.1943-7897.0000784.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272174
    description abstractCoal reservoirs are highly heterogeneous, and different macrolithotypes of coal have differences in material composition and pore structure, resulting in different coalbed methane (CBM) adsorption/desorption performance and gas-water migration characteristics. In order to explore the pore development characteristics of different macrolithotypes in low-rank coal and their influence on adsorption and desorption, the low-rank coal of the Yan’an Formation in the Huanglong coalfield is taken as the sample of the research object. Vitrain and durain are collected and then separated. The results show that the porosity of coal is 2.92%–11.81%, and the total porosity is relatively developed. The porosity of durain is slightly higher than that of vitrain, the pore throat of durain is thicker, and the macropores are more developed. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area (SSA) and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) total pore volume (TPV) of vitrain is slightly larger than durain, the micropores are more developed, and most of them are semiclosed and ink-bottle-shaped pores. The pore-fracture connectivity of the durain is better than vitrain via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Vitrain has more developed micropores than durain, with larger specific surface area and stronger adsorption capacity. In the process of methane adsorption/desorption, the phenomenon of desorption hysteresis generally exists. Moreover, the pore connectivity of durain is relatively good, the degree of desorption hysteresis is weaker than vitrain, and the theoretical desorption efficiency is higher than vitrain. Temperature has a significant influence on adsorption and desorption of methane. The increase in temperature is beneficial to desorption and weakens the hysteresis effect of desorption. At the same temperature, the isosteric adsorption heat in the desorption process is greater than the adsorption process, which further explains the incomplete reversibility of the adsorption and desorption process. Under the same conditions, the isosteric adsorption heat of vitrain in the adsorption process is greater than durain, and adsorption capacity of vitrain is stronger than durain. Similarly, the isosteric adsorption heat of vitrain in the desorption process is greater than durain, and desorption needs to absorb more heat. The desorption capacity is weaker than durain.
    publisherASCE
    titleDifferences of the Pore Structure and Methane Adsorption/Desorption between Vitrain and Durain of Low-Rank Coals: Case Study in the Huanglong Coalfield, Southern Ordos Basin, China
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Energy Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000784
    journal fristpage04021038-1
    journal lastpage04021038-21
    page21
    treeJournal of Energy Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian