Experimental and Modeling Comparisons of Ash-Treated Pine Biochar and Activated Carbon for the Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Matter and Organic MicropollutantsSource: Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 009::page 04021028-1DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001895Publisher: ASCE
Abstract: A novel powdered ash-treated pine biochar (PATB) was compared to powdered activated carbon (PAC) for the removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and organic micropollutants (OMPs) from deionized water (DI), raw surface water (SW), and treated wastewater (WW). PATB performance (capacity and kinetics) was the primary focus under realistic water treatment adsorbent doses (<200 mg/L) and contact times (<120 min). For the removal of DOM, iohexol (IOH), sucralose (SUC), and sulfamethoxazole, PAC consistently outperformed PATB. For the more readily adsorbable OMPs carbamazepine, cotinine, DEET, and theobromine, removal by the two adsorbents was comparable. Dose-response and kinetic results for each adsorbent between SW and WW for DOM, IOH, and SUC were similar, as their initial dissolved organic carbon concentrations were diluted to the same range: 2.0–2.2 mg/L. SUC was found to have a higher affinity for PATB in DI, but ultimate removal was still limited by its lower specific surface area compared to PAC (∼500 versus ∼1,000 m2/g). Additional investigations included combined adsorbent treatment and projecting batch results to fixed-bed breakthrough curves for hypothetical full-scale granular activated carbon and granular ash-treated biochar adsorbers using both the homogeneous surface diffusion model and pore and surface diffusion model.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Anthony M. Kennedy | |
| contributor author | Miguel Arias-Paić | |
| contributor author | Matthew J. Bentley | |
| contributor author | R. Scott Summers | |
| date accessioned | 2022-02-01T21:48:18Z | |
| date available | 2022-02-01T21:48:18Z | |
| date issued | 9/1/2021 | |
| identifier other | %28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0001895.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4272062 | |
| description abstract | A novel powdered ash-treated pine biochar (PATB) was compared to powdered activated carbon (PAC) for the removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) and organic micropollutants (OMPs) from deionized water (DI), raw surface water (SW), and treated wastewater (WW). PATB performance (capacity and kinetics) was the primary focus under realistic water treatment adsorbent doses (<200 mg/L) and contact times (<120 min). For the removal of DOM, iohexol (IOH), sucralose (SUC), and sulfamethoxazole, PAC consistently outperformed PATB. For the more readily adsorbable OMPs carbamazepine, cotinine, DEET, and theobromine, removal by the two adsorbents was comparable. Dose-response and kinetic results for each adsorbent between SW and WW for DOM, IOH, and SUC were similar, as their initial dissolved organic carbon concentrations were diluted to the same range: 2.0–2.2 mg/L. SUC was found to have a higher affinity for PATB in DI, but ultimate removal was still limited by its lower specific surface area compared to PAC (∼500 versus ∼1,000 m2/g). Additional investigations included combined adsorbent treatment and projecting batch results to fixed-bed breakthrough curves for hypothetical full-scale granular activated carbon and granular ash-treated biochar adsorbers using both the homogeneous surface diffusion model and pore and surface diffusion model. | |
| publisher | ASCE | |
| title | Experimental and Modeling Comparisons of Ash-Treated Pine Biochar and Activated Carbon for the Adsorption of Dissolved Organic Matter and Organic Micropollutants | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 147 | |
| journal issue | 9 | |
| journal title | Journal of Environmental Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001895 | |
| journal fristpage | 04021028-1 | |
| journal lastpage | 04021028-12 | |
| page | 12 | |
| tree | Journal of Environmental Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 009 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |