YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Nitrate Removal from Groundwater by Electrocoagulation: Process Optimization through Response Surface Method

    Source: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2021:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 003::page 04021014-1
    Author:
    Sanigdha Acharya
    ,
    S. K. Sharma
    ,
    Vinita Khandegar
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000617
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This study will investigate the removal of nitrate from groundwater by aluminum–aluminum (Al–Al) electrocoagulation (EC) using response surface methodology. Box–Behnken design (BBD) will be used to investigate the mutual interaction effect of important process parameters, such as current density (A), electrolysis time (C), and spacing (B) on nitrate removal efficiency (NRE %) from four groundwater samples with different initial nitrate concentrations. Experiments will be performed according to the BBD matrix and the data obtained fitted well to a quadratic model that demonstrated a good association between the predicted and experimental values with >R2 = 0.97 for all samples. In ANOVA studies, a p-value of <0.00001 was obtained, which confirmed the suitability of the regression models (p-value <0.05). In addition, a small value for the coefficient of variation (3.95%, 1.65%, 2.90%, and 3.84%) for all the samples indicated a higher degree of accuracy and the reliability of the experiments. ANOVA results and three-dimensional (3D) plots suggested that A and C were the main process parameters in this study and B had a negative effect on NRE %. Maximum NREs (%) of 92.5 (106 mg/L), 91.5 (133 mg/L), 83.5 (148 mg/L), and 71 (231 mg/L) were obtained at C = 1.6–2.78 h, A = 0.065 A/cm2, and B = 1 cm. In addition, for the feasibility of EC at an industrial scale, the management of the generated sludge was explained by its characterization using scanning electron transmission microscopy (SEM). This study concluded that the EC approach might be a promising technique for application to nitrate removal from groundwater.
    • Download: (2.136Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Nitrate Removal from Groundwater by Electrocoagulation: Process Optimization through Response Surface Method

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271696
    Collections
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSanigdha Acharya
    contributor authorS. K. Sharma
    contributor authorVinita Khandegar
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:35:11Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:35:11Z
    date issued7/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HZ.2153-5515.0000617.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271696
    description abstractThis study will investigate the removal of nitrate from groundwater by aluminum–aluminum (Al–Al) electrocoagulation (EC) using response surface methodology. Box–Behnken design (BBD) will be used to investigate the mutual interaction effect of important process parameters, such as current density (A), electrolysis time (C), and spacing (B) on nitrate removal efficiency (NRE %) from four groundwater samples with different initial nitrate concentrations. Experiments will be performed according to the BBD matrix and the data obtained fitted well to a quadratic model that demonstrated a good association between the predicted and experimental values with >R2 = 0.97 for all samples. In ANOVA studies, a p-value of <0.00001 was obtained, which confirmed the suitability of the regression models (p-value <0.05). In addition, a small value for the coefficient of variation (3.95%, 1.65%, 2.90%, and 3.84%) for all the samples indicated a higher degree of accuracy and the reliability of the experiments. ANOVA results and three-dimensional (3D) plots suggested that A and C were the main process parameters in this study and B had a negative effect on NRE %. Maximum NREs (%) of 92.5 (106 mg/L), 91.5 (133 mg/L), 83.5 (148 mg/L), and 71 (231 mg/L) were obtained at C = 1.6–2.78 h, A = 0.065 A/cm2, and B = 1 cm. In addition, for the feasibility of EC at an industrial scale, the management of the generated sludge was explained by its characterization using scanning electron transmission microscopy (SEM). This study concluded that the EC approach might be a promising technique for application to nitrate removal from groundwater.
    publisherASCE
    titleNitrate Removal from Groundwater by Electrocoagulation: Process Optimization through Response Surface Method
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000617
    journal fristpage04021014-1
    journal lastpage04021014-14
    page14
    treeJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2021:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian