YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Experimental Evaluation and Stress–Fractional Modeling of the State-Dependent Behavior of Rockfill

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2021:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 007::page 04021109-1
    Author:
    Jingshan Jiang
    ,
    Yifei Sun
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002070
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: As one of the main filled materials of the Lianghekou (LHK) rockfill dam, the strength and deformation characteristics of LHK rockfill is of great interest for hydraulic and geotechnical engineers. Correct interpretation of the state-dependent behavior of LHK rockfill is necessary for the design, construction, and operation of the dam. Therefore, a series of large-scale triaxial tests on LHK rockfill with different initial states were carried out in this study, where the state-dependent strength and deformation behaviors of LHK rockfill were investigated. It was found that both the phase transformation state and peak state of LHK rockfill are dependent on the material state. To capture such state-dependent behavior, two elastoplastic models (i.e., α1-model and α2-model) based on different stress–fractional concepts were developed and compared. It was found that the fractional order (α1) in α1-model exhibits insignificant dependence on the material state of LHK rockfill, whereas the fractional order (α2) in α2-model is dependent on the material state. As the fractional order determines the plastic flow direction of rockfill, it should be identified carefully, otherwise, an overestimation or underestimation of the critical-state stress may occur when using α2-model. Further validation against the large-scale triaxial data of LHK rockfill shows that without using additional plastic potentials, the two models can reasonably reproduce the state-dependent behavior of LHK rockfill. A slightly better performance on simulating the stress–strain response is observed when using α1-model, whereas α2-model works better when simulating the stress–dilatancy response.
    • Download: (2.561Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Experimental Evaluation and Stress–Fractional Modeling of the State-Dependent Behavior of Rockfill

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271410
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJingshan Jiang
    contributor authorYifei Sun
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:25:24Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:25:24Z
    date issued7/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29GM.1943-5622.0002070.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271410
    description abstractAs one of the main filled materials of the Lianghekou (LHK) rockfill dam, the strength and deformation characteristics of LHK rockfill is of great interest for hydraulic and geotechnical engineers. Correct interpretation of the state-dependent behavior of LHK rockfill is necessary for the design, construction, and operation of the dam. Therefore, a series of large-scale triaxial tests on LHK rockfill with different initial states were carried out in this study, where the state-dependent strength and deformation behaviors of LHK rockfill were investigated. It was found that both the phase transformation state and peak state of LHK rockfill are dependent on the material state. To capture such state-dependent behavior, two elastoplastic models (i.e., α1-model and α2-model) based on different stress–fractional concepts were developed and compared. It was found that the fractional order (α1) in α1-model exhibits insignificant dependence on the material state of LHK rockfill, whereas the fractional order (α2) in α2-model is dependent on the material state. As the fractional order determines the plastic flow direction of rockfill, it should be identified carefully, otherwise, an overestimation or underestimation of the critical-state stress may occur when using α2-model. Further validation against the large-scale triaxial data of LHK rockfill shows that without using additional plastic potentials, the two models can reasonably reproduce the state-dependent behavior of LHK rockfill. A slightly better performance on simulating the stress–strain response is observed when using α1-model, whereas α2-model works better when simulating the stress–dilatancy response.
    publisherASCE
    titleExperimental Evaluation and Stress–Fractional Modeling of the State-Dependent Behavior of Rockfill
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume21
    journal issue7
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002070
    journal fristpage04021109-1
    journal lastpage04021109-12
    page12
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2021:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian