YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Examining the Impact of Rate-of-Return Regulation on Capital Project Planning

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 008::page 04021080-1
    Author:
    Rachael Sherman
    ,
    G. Edward Gibson Jr.
    ,
    Edward Merrow
    ,
    Kristen Parrish
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002069
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: As the United States’ population grows and power delivery needs continue to expand, utility companies are presented with a unique opportunity to improve reliability, increase capacity, and provide innovations to power and pipeline production and delivery infrastructure. While there is research dedicated to the impacts of the regulatory environment on project performance and the profitability of power and pipeline projects, there has been no research dedicated to identifying the differences in planning processes for such projects. Therefore, this paper contributes to the construction body of knowledge by explicitly documenting how the regulatory environment impacts the planning metrics involved in power and pipeline utility projects. This paper explores how capital project planning varies for power and pipeline projects in both regulated and nonregulated environments through an analysis of 770 projects in the Independent Project Analysis (IPA), project database. This paper presents a statistical comparison of pipeline and power project planning indicators—front-end loading (FEL) score, budget spent on front-end planning, and stakeholders engaged in front-end planning—to understand the impact of the regulatory environment on project planning. The results suggest that for some planning indicators studied, regulated projects outperform nonregulated projects, and for other indicators, the reverse is true. In particular, results show that regulated pipeline projects have better a project definition at the time of project authorization than nonregulated pipeline projects based on the FEL score; the reverse is true for power projects. Regulated pipeline and power projects spend more in a budget on front-end planning than nonregulated pipeline and power projects. Lastly, key stakeholders are represented in both regulatory environments with little difference between nonregulated and regulated environments in both pipeline projects, but power projects in regulated environments engage the key stakeholders for more time.
    • Download: (345.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Examining the Impact of Rate-of-Return Regulation on Capital Project Planning

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271042
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRachael Sherman
    contributor authorG. Edward Gibson Jr.
    contributor authorEdward Merrow
    contributor authorKristen Parrish
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:11:05Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:11:05Z
    date issued8/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0002069.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4271042
    description abstractAs the United States’ population grows and power delivery needs continue to expand, utility companies are presented with a unique opportunity to improve reliability, increase capacity, and provide innovations to power and pipeline production and delivery infrastructure. While there is research dedicated to the impacts of the regulatory environment on project performance and the profitability of power and pipeline projects, there has been no research dedicated to identifying the differences in planning processes for such projects. Therefore, this paper contributes to the construction body of knowledge by explicitly documenting how the regulatory environment impacts the planning metrics involved in power and pipeline utility projects. This paper explores how capital project planning varies for power and pipeline projects in both regulated and nonregulated environments through an analysis of 770 projects in the Independent Project Analysis (IPA), project database. This paper presents a statistical comparison of pipeline and power project planning indicators—front-end loading (FEL) score, budget spent on front-end planning, and stakeholders engaged in front-end planning—to understand the impact of the regulatory environment on project planning. The results suggest that for some planning indicators studied, regulated projects outperform nonregulated projects, and for other indicators, the reverse is true. In particular, results show that regulated pipeline projects have better a project definition at the time of project authorization than nonregulated pipeline projects based on the FEL score; the reverse is true for power projects. Regulated pipeline and power projects spend more in a budget on front-end planning than nonregulated pipeline and power projects. Lastly, key stakeholders are represented in both regulatory environments with little difference between nonregulated and regulated environments in both pipeline projects, but power projects in regulated environments engage the key stakeholders for more time.
    publisherASCE
    titleExamining the Impact of Rate-of-Return Regulation on Capital Project Planning
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002069
    journal fristpage04021080-1
    journal lastpage04021080-9
    page9
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian