YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Relationship between Commissioning and Start-Up Success Factors Achievement and Performance in Capital Projects

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 003::page 04021001-1
    Author:
    James T. O’Connor
    ,
    Binit K. Shrestha
    ,
    Matthew Winkler
    ,
    Jin Ouk Choi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001999
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Many industrial projects have experienced significant operability problems and failed to achieve capital project investment objectives during the commissioning and start-up (CSU) phase. To accomplish capital project investment objectives and achieve overall project success, thorough CSU planning, as well as execution of the CSU plan, are critical. However, the importance of CSU planning and execution is often treated lightly. To ensure more effective and successful CSUs for capital facilities, this study examined the correlation between CSU success factor achievement and CSU performance in capital projects, with the empirical data from 26 sample industrial capital projects. To accomplish this research goal, this study (1) developed CSU success factor achievement indicators that can recognize and assess projects’ CSU achievement, and (2) examined the correlation between these CSU success factor achievement indicators and actual CSU performance in capital projects. This study contributes to the body of knowledge in project planning, particularly CSU planning, by (1) identifying 46 CSU success factor achievement indicators, and (2) identifying the relationship between CSU success factor achievement indicators and CSU performance in capital projects. This study contributes to practice by showing how project CSU performance can be improved through the implementation of CSU success factor achievement indicators. Project teams (and their clients) can benefit substantially by paying attention to these CSU success factor achievement indicators.
    • Download: (583.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Relationship between Commissioning and Start-Up Success Factors Achievement and Performance in Capital Projects

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270973
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJames T. O’Connor
    contributor authorBinit K. Shrestha
    contributor authorMatthew Winkler
    contributor authorJin Ouk Choi
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:08:11Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:08:11Z
    date issued3/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001999.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270973
    description abstractMany industrial projects have experienced significant operability problems and failed to achieve capital project investment objectives during the commissioning and start-up (CSU) phase. To accomplish capital project investment objectives and achieve overall project success, thorough CSU planning, as well as execution of the CSU plan, are critical. However, the importance of CSU planning and execution is often treated lightly. To ensure more effective and successful CSUs for capital facilities, this study examined the correlation between CSU success factor achievement and CSU performance in capital projects, with the empirical data from 26 sample industrial capital projects. To accomplish this research goal, this study (1) developed CSU success factor achievement indicators that can recognize and assess projects’ CSU achievement, and (2) examined the correlation between these CSU success factor achievement indicators and actual CSU performance in capital projects. This study contributes to the body of knowledge in project planning, particularly CSU planning, by (1) identifying 46 CSU success factor achievement indicators, and (2) identifying the relationship between CSU success factor achievement indicators and CSU performance in capital projects. This study contributes to practice by showing how project CSU performance can be improved through the implementation of CSU success factor achievement indicators. Project teams (and their clients) can benefit substantially by paying attention to these CSU success factor achievement indicators.
    publisherASCE
    titleRelationship between Commissioning and Start-Up Success Factors Achievement and Performance in Capital Projects
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001999
    journal fristpage04021001-1
    journal lastpage04021001-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian