YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Incorporating a Multiple-Benefit Analysis into a Stormwater Decision-Support Tool at Planning Level

    Source: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment:;2021:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 003::page 04021011-1
    Author:
    Katie M. Spahr
    ,
    Colin D. Bell
    ,
    Elizabeth M. Gallo
    ,
    John E. McCray
    ,
    Terri S. Hogue
    DOI: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000952
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: As we move into an era of increased urbanization, stormwater practitioners are charged with creating multibenefit solutions through the installation of stormwater control measures (SCMs). Two drivers facilitate the accrual of benefits in SCMs: hydrologic or water quality process and vegetation. This study investigated the feasibility of incorporating benefits beyond water quality and quantity control into the SCM planning process. A critical review was used to determine which benefits would be assessed with hydrologic and water quality modeling or a complementary conceptual framework. Drawing on common themes in the literature, the conceptual framework of the 4 Cs (community, context, connectivity, and canopy) was created to assess vegetation-based benefits. To demonstrate the coupled benefit assessment, a case study was performed in a neighborhood of Denver, Colorado. Results from hydrologic and water quality modeling show that vegetated swales provide the most preferred solution. From the vegetation-based benefit perspective, we find that the modeled area of the vegetated swales is only 0.2% by area, which is likely too small to have a measurable benefit effect at the neighborhood scale. We show how the 4 Cs can be used to leverage existing greenness to maximize the potential vegetation-based benefit of swales and consider how existing sociodemographic and vegetation trends can be leveraged to make benefit-driven decisions.
    • Download: (2.314Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Incorporating a Multiple-Benefit Analysis into a Stormwater Decision-Support Tool at Planning Level

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270793
    Collections
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKatie M. Spahr
    contributor authorColin D. Bell
    contributor authorElizabeth M. Gallo
    contributor authorJohn E. McCray
    contributor authorTerri S. Hogue
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:02:15Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:02:15Z
    date issued8/1/2021
    identifier otherJSWBAY.0000952.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270793
    description abstractAs we move into an era of increased urbanization, stormwater practitioners are charged with creating multibenefit solutions through the installation of stormwater control measures (SCMs). Two drivers facilitate the accrual of benefits in SCMs: hydrologic or water quality process and vegetation. This study investigated the feasibility of incorporating benefits beyond water quality and quantity control into the SCM planning process. A critical review was used to determine which benefits would be assessed with hydrologic and water quality modeling or a complementary conceptual framework. Drawing on common themes in the literature, the conceptual framework of the 4 Cs (community, context, connectivity, and canopy) was created to assess vegetation-based benefits. To demonstrate the coupled benefit assessment, a case study was performed in a neighborhood of Denver, Colorado. Results from hydrologic and water quality modeling show that vegetated swales provide the most preferred solution. From the vegetation-based benefit perspective, we find that the modeled area of the vegetated swales is only 0.2% by area, which is likely too small to have a measurable benefit effect at the neighborhood scale. We show how the 4 Cs can be used to leverage existing greenness to maximize the potential vegetation-based benefit of swales and consider how existing sociodemographic and vegetation trends can be leveraged to make benefit-driven decisions.
    publisherASCE
    titleIncorporating a Multiple-Benefit Analysis into a Stormwater Decision-Support Tool at Planning Level
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    identifier doi10.1061/JSWBAY.0000952
    journal fristpage04021011-1
    journal lastpage04021011-13
    page13
    treeJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment:;2021:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian