YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Runoff Reduction by Four Green Stormwater Infrastructure Systems in a Shared Environment

    Source: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment:;2021:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 002::page 04021004-1
    Author:
    Gail Moruza Hayes
    ,
    Charles Burgis
    ,
    Wuhuan Zhang
    ,
    Derek Henderson
    ,
    James A. Smith
    DOI: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000932
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Green stormwater infrastructure (GI) imitates the hydrology of undeveloped land to mediate the impacts of stormwater runoff, but research is lacking that characterizes the performances of different types of independent GI systems in close proximity to each other in terms of runoff volume reduction. To address this gap, the runoff reduction by four GI systems was monitored for 48 rain events ranging in depth from 2.8 to 96.5 mm, with a total rain depth of 1,404.1 mm from June 2018 to July 2019, during their first full year of operation. The GI systems, located within 1 km of each other along Lorton Road in Fairfax County, Virginia, were a grass channel (GC), bioretention (BR), bioswale (BS), and compost-amended grass channel (CAGC). The GC, BR, and BS were on track to well exceed minimum requirements of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, with relative runoff reductions of 78%, 71%, and 56%, respectively, but the CAGC performed near its requirement at 43%. Contrary to expectations, the simply designed GC achieved the highest runoff reduction. The BR, with the second highest runoff reduction, had a small footprint relative to its contributing drainage area and demonstrated the least variation in performance in variable rainfall depths, intensities, and durations. The relatively small volume reductions of the BS and CAGC were attributed to their respective design elements: a sloping underdrain and close proximity to the road. This field study explored variations in runoff volume reductions of the four systems in various rainfall and seasonal conditions with respect to their design complexities, providing insights for future design and implementation of GI.
    • Download: (16.37Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Runoff Reduction by Four Green Stormwater Infrastructure Systems in a Shared Environment

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270776
    Collections
    • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGail Moruza Hayes
    contributor authorCharles Burgis
    contributor authorWuhuan Zhang
    contributor authorDerek Henderson
    contributor authorJames A. Smith
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:01:45Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:01:45Z
    date issued5/1/2021
    identifier otherJSWBAY.0000932.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270776
    description abstractGreen stormwater infrastructure (GI) imitates the hydrology of undeveloped land to mediate the impacts of stormwater runoff, but research is lacking that characterizes the performances of different types of independent GI systems in close proximity to each other in terms of runoff volume reduction. To address this gap, the runoff reduction by four GI systems was monitored for 48 rain events ranging in depth from 2.8 to 96.5 mm, with a total rain depth of 1,404.1 mm from June 2018 to July 2019, during their first full year of operation. The GI systems, located within 1 km of each other along Lorton Road in Fairfax County, Virginia, were a grass channel (GC), bioretention (BR), bioswale (BS), and compost-amended grass channel (CAGC). The GC, BR, and BS were on track to well exceed minimum requirements of the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, with relative runoff reductions of 78%, 71%, and 56%, respectively, but the CAGC performed near its requirement at 43%. Contrary to expectations, the simply designed GC achieved the highest runoff reduction. The BR, with the second highest runoff reduction, had a small footprint relative to its contributing drainage area and demonstrated the least variation in performance in variable rainfall depths, intensities, and durations. The relatively small volume reductions of the BS and CAGC were attributed to their respective design elements: a sloping underdrain and close proximity to the road. This field study explored variations in runoff volume reductions of the four systems in various rainfall and seasonal conditions with respect to their design complexities, providing insights for future design and implementation of GI.
    publisherASCE
    titleRunoff Reduction by Four Green Stormwater Infrastructure Systems in a Shared Environment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
    identifier doi10.1061/JSWBAY.0000932
    journal fristpage04021004-1
    journal lastpage04021004-19
    page19
    treeJournal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment:;2021:;Volume ( 007 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian