YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Work Zone Road User Cost of Pavements Based on Rehabilitation Strategy Approach

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 002::page 04021015-1
    Author:
    Ali Pasha
    ,
    Ahmad Mansourian
    ,
    Mehdi Ravanshadnia
    DOI: 10.1061/JPEODX.0000268
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is a common tool to select road pavement type. In the pavement type selection process, most government agencies consider the costs of initial construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation; however, user costs are rarely considered. In this paper, work zone road user costs (WZ RUC) are estimated based on the rehabilitation strategies of the pavement types. Also, the implementation timing of the rehabilitation activities, which lead to the lowest user costs, is determined as the lowest WZ RUC strategy. Due to uncertainty in timing of the rehabilitation activities, the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and fuzzy logic are used to evaluate WZ RUC in rehabilitation strategies. The service life of pavement types is used to determine the probability of occurrence and membership degree of the lowest WZ RUC strategy. According to the proposed methodology and using the rehabilitation strategies, WZ RUC of a project with four types of pavements, including hot mix asphalt (HMA), stone mastic asphalt (SMA), jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP), and continuous reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP), are evaluated and the best alternative is proposed. Due to the importance of uncertainty in the rehabilitation strategy to estimate the user costs, the proposed method may be employed to select the best pavement type, especially when the agency life cycle costs of pavement types are almost equal.
    • Download: (768.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Work Zone Road User Cost of Pavements Based on Rehabilitation Strategy Approach

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270755
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAli Pasha
    contributor authorAhmad Mansourian
    contributor authorMehdi Ravanshadnia
    date accessioned2022-02-01T00:01:10Z
    date available2022-02-01T00:01:10Z
    date issued6/1/2021
    identifier otherJPEODX.0000268.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270755
    description abstractLife cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is a common tool to select road pavement type. In the pavement type selection process, most government agencies consider the costs of initial construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation; however, user costs are rarely considered. In this paper, work zone road user costs (WZ RUC) are estimated based on the rehabilitation strategies of the pavement types. Also, the implementation timing of the rehabilitation activities, which lead to the lowest user costs, is determined as the lowest WZ RUC strategy. Due to uncertainty in timing of the rehabilitation activities, the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and fuzzy logic are used to evaluate WZ RUC in rehabilitation strategies. The service life of pavement types is used to determine the probability of occurrence and membership degree of the lowest WZ RUC strategy. According to the proposed methodology and using the rehabilitation strategies, WZ RUC of a project with four types of pavements, including hot mix asphalt (HMA), stone mastic asphalt (SMA), jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP), and continuous reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP), are evaluated and the best alternative is proposed. Due to the importance of uncertainty in the rehabilitation strategy to estimate the user costs, the proposed method may be employed to select the best pavement type, especially when the agency life cycle costs of pavement types are almost equal.
    publisherASCE
    titleEvaluation of Work Zone Road User Cost of Pavements Based on Rehabilitation Strategy Approach
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    identifier doi10.1061/JPEODX.0000268
    journal fristpage04021015-1
    journal lastpage04021015-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian