YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Material Property Uncertainties versus Joint Structural Detailing: Relative Effect on the Seismic Fragility of Reinforced Concrete Frames

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 004::page 04021007-1
    Author:
    Roberto Gentile
    ,
    Carmine Galasso
    ,
    Stefano Pampanin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002917
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This paper investigates the relative effect of material properties and structural details in the joint panels on the seismic fragility of existing reinforced concrete (RC) frames. Five building classes with different structural details (particularly in the joint panels) and material characteristics are defined according to different past design codes, for a three-story and a six-story archetype geometry. Based on nonlinear static or nonlinear dynamic analysis procedures, results from the study show that the effect of structural details on seismic fragility of the considered structures is negligible for damage states involving an essentially elastic behavior. Conversely, it is much higher for life-safety and near-collapse damage states, and it is considerably higher than the effect due to materials. Therefore, in the diagnosis phase, higher emphasis should be given to on-site investigations of actual reinforcement content/layout rather than to invasive material testing. The uncertainty related to the structural details described here is practically related to exterior, rather than interior, joint panels. Cover removal for one of those joints may potentially eliminate this specific uncertainty. As a practical action, in situ testing of RC frames should involve the cover removal of at least one exterior joint panel regardless of the required target “level of knowledge” of the existing structure.
    • Download: (5.995Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Material Property Uncertainties versus Joint Structural Detailing: Relative Effect on the Seismic Fragility of Reinforced Concrete Frames

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270296
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRoberto Gentile
    contributor authorCarmine Galasso
    contributor authorStefano Pampanin
    date accessioned2022-01-31T23:45:15Z
    date available2022-01-31T23:45:15Z
    date issued4/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0002917.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4270296
    description abstractThis paper investigates the relative effect of material properties and structural details in the joint panels on the seismic fragility of existing reinforced concrete (RC) frames. Five building classes with different structural details (particularly in the joint panels) and material characteristics are defined according to different past design codes, for a three-story and a six-story archetype geometry. Based on nonlinear static or nonlinear dynamic analysis procedures, results from the study show that the effect of structural details on seismic fragility of the considered structures is negligible for damage states involving an essentially elastic behavior. Conversely, it is much higher for life-safety and near-collapse damage states, and it is considerably higher than the effect due to materials. Therefore, in the diagnosis phase, higher emphasis should be given to on-site investigations of actual reinforcement content/layout rather than to invasive material testing. The uncertainty related to the structural details described here is practically related to exterior, rather than interior, joint panels. Cover removal for one of those joints may potentially eliminate this specific uncertainty. As a practical action, in situ testing of RC frames should involve the cover removal of at least one exterior joint panel regardless of the required target “level of knowledge” of the existing structure.
    publisherASCE
    titleMaterial Property Uncertainties versus Joint Structural Detailing: Relative Effect on the Seismic Fragility of Reinforced Concrete Frames
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002917
    journal fristpage04021007-1
    journal lastpage04021007-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian