YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Visual Ethnographic Evaluation of Construction Programs at Public Universities: Who is Valued in Construction Education?

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 004::page 04021025-1
    Author:
    Jared Burgoon
    ,
    Erin Arneson
    ,
    Jonathan W. Elliott
    ,
    Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000899
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The US construction management profession has failed to recruit and retain women and underrepresented racial-ethnic minorities (URMs) in the workforce, despite growing industry demand for college-educated graduates due to skilled-labor shortages. Women and URM students in four-year construction education programs are more likely to change majors or drop out when they are unable to develop a sense of belonging in their degree program, exacerbating the lack of diversity and labor shortages in the construction industry. Students’ physical learning environment on campus can convey nonverbal messages regarding belonging, and can therefore influence student retention and persistence. This study systematically evaluated 140 physical artifacts (art, signs, photographs, etc.) on display in three construction education programs at US land-grant universities. Utilizing an existing visual anthropological taxonomy designed to interpret equity messages communicated by artifacts, researchers explored nonverbal messages relating to the question of who is valued and who belongs’ in construction education. White men were regularly named and represented in positions of power and leadership in the evaluated artifacts. In contrast, women and URMs were typically underrepresented and unnamed, with people of color overly portrayed in construction manual labor roles. Results suggest that construction education programs can foster more inclusive student learning environments by diversifying and updating physical artifacts on display within department public spaces and classrooms.
    • Download: (1.231Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Visual Ethnographic Evaluation of Construction Programs at Public Universities: Who is Valued in Construction Education?

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269826
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJared Burgoon
    contributor authorErin Arneson
    contributor authorJonathan W. Elliott
    contributor authorRodolfo Valdes-Vasquez
    date accessioned2022-01-31T23:29:51Z
    date available2022-01-31T23:29:51Z
    date issued7/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000899.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269826
    description abstractThe US construction management profession has failed to recruit and retain women and underrepresented racial-ethnic minorities (URMs) in the workforce, despite growing industry demand for college-educated graduates due to skilled-labor shortages. Women and URM students in four-year construction education programs are more likely to change majors or drop out when they are unable to develop a sense of belonging in their degree program, exacerbating the lack of diversity and labor shortages in the construction industry. Students’ physical learning environment on campus can convey nonverbal messages regarding belonging, and can therefore influence student retention and persistence. This study systematically evaluated 140 physical artifacts (art, signs, photographs, etc.) on display in three construction education programs at US land-grant universities. Utilizing an existing visual anthropological taxonomy designed to interpret equity messages communicated by artifacts, researchers explored nonverbal messages relating to the question of who is valued and who belongs’ in construction education. White men were regularly named and represented in positions of power and leadership in the evaluated artifacts. In contrast, women and URMs were typically underrepresented and unnamed, with people of color overly portrayed in construction manual labor roles. Results suggest that construction education programs can foster more inclusive student learning environments by diversifying and updating physical artifacts on display within department public spaces and classrooms.
    publisherASCE
    titleVisual Ethnographic Evaluation of Construction Programs at Public Universities: Who is Valued in Construction Education?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume37
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000899
    journal fristpage04021025-1
    journal lastpage04021025-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian