YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Risk Sharing Strategies for IPD Projects: Interactional Analysis of Participants’ Decision-Making

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 001::page 04020101-1
    Author:
    Guiliang Su
    ,
    Makarand Hastak
    ,
    Xiaomei Deng
    ,
    Rana Khallaf
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000853
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: In the Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) approach, partner selection, contract signing as well as the signing of participants’ task scope, and the setting of incentive plans usually take place before the design of a project has been completed. This brings risks and uncertainties to project management. To overcome these challenges, the proposed framework for risk sharing strategies in IPD projects should consider four levels that interact in the system: (1) risks in goal achievement (such as cost overruns); (2) risks that occur during the project management process; (3) the incentive mechanism; and (4) participants’ decisions. In the study described in this paper, the interaction of the participants’ decision-making in situations of risk and the factors affecting the interaction were identified and modeled for IPD projects. The equilibria were calculated using game theory, and simulations were carried out to showcase the interaction process and the factors that influence participants’ decision-making and project performance. An epidemic model, network analysis, and regression analysis were also used for the simulation and analysis of risk propagation on the risk network. Furthermore, strategies to improve project performance and mitigate risk propagation were developed. In theory, this paper fills the gaps in previous research and proposes an approach for further research on risk sharing practices in IPD projects. The findings are also helpful to practitioners of IPD projects for risk analysis, partner selection, team building, setting of incentive mechanisms, and handling of project risks.
    • Download: (1.101Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Risk Sharing Strategies for IPD Projects: Interactional Analysis of Participants’ Decision-Making

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269799
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGuiliang Su
    contributor authorMakarand Hastak
    contributor authorXiaomei Deng
    contributor authorRana Khallaf
    date accessioned2022-01-31T23:28:54Z
    date available2022-01-31T23:28:54Z
    date issued1/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000853.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269799
    description abstractIn the Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) approach, partner selection, contract signing as well as the signing of participants’ task scope, and the setting of incentive plans usually take place before the design of a project has been completed. This brings risks and uncertainties to project management. To overcome these challenges, the proposed framework for risk sharing strategies in IPD projects should consider four levels that interact in the system: (1) risks in goal achievement (such as cost overruns); (2) risks that occur during the project management process; (3) the incentive mechanism; and (4) participants’ decisions. In the study described in this paper, the interaction of the participants’ decision-making in situations of risk and the factors affecting the interaction were identified and modeled for IPD projects. The equilibria were calculated using game theory, and simulations were carried out to showcase the interaction process and the factors that influence participants’ decision-making and project performance. An epidemic model, network analysis, and regression analysis were also used for the simulation and analysis of risk propagation on the risk network. Furthermore, strategies to improve project performance and mitigate risk propagation were developed. In theory, this paper fills the gaps in previous research and proposes an approach for further research on risk sharing practices in IPD projects. The findings are also helpful to practitioners of IPD projects for risk analysis, partner selection, team building, setting of incentive mechanisms, and handling of project risks.
    publisherASCE
    titleRisk Sharing Strategies for IPD Projects: Interactional Analysis of Participants’ Decision-Making
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume37
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000853
    journal fristpage04020101-1
    journal lastpage04020101-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian