YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Litigation Risk Transfer Mechanisms in Construction Dispute Resolution Process: Cross-Case Analysis

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2021:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 003::page 04521018-1
    Author:
    Murali Jagannathan
    ,
    Ulrike Quapp
    ,
    Venkata Santosh Kumar Delhi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000486
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Disputes in construction projects are a common phenomenon around the world. The practice of approaching courts to resolve disputes, a risk-seeking behavior of parties in a dispute, is influenced by several factors. The availability of litigation risk transfer instruments like litigation insurance (LI) and third-party litigation funding (TPLF) can potentially change the litigious behavior of disputants. LI and TPLF markets have evolved differently in various jurisdictions around the world. The variation in the maturity levels provides a research opportunity to distill and document the learnings pertaining to the growth LI and TPLF in matured regimes and apply them in nascent markets. In this research, the authors consider the German (matured market for LI and TPLF) and Indian (nascent market) jurisdictions to identify potential focus areas influencing the growth of litigation risk transfer instruments. With reference to TPLF, this study concludes that while the legal framework is no doubt important in creating a favorable climate for adoption, its growth is influenced by agreement-level factors.
    • Download: (357.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Litigation Risk Transfer Mechanisms in Construction Dispute Resolution Process: Cross-Case Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269796
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMurali Jagannathan
    contributor authorUlrike Quapp
    contributor authorVenkata Santosh Kumar Delhi
    date accessioned2022-01-31T23:28:50Z
    date available2022-01-31T23:28:50Z
    date issued8/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29LA.1943-4170.0000486.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269796
    description abstractDisputes in construction projects are a common phenomenon around the world. The practice of approaching courts to resolve disputes, a risk-seeking behavior of parties in a dispute, is influenced by several factors. The availability of litigation risk transfer instruments like litigation insurance (LI) and third-party litigation funding (TPLF) can potentially change the litigious behavior of disputants. LI and TPLF markets have evolved differently in various jurisdictions around the world. The variation in the maturity levels provides a research opportunity to distill and document the learnings pertaining to the growth LI and TPLF in matured regimes and apply them in nascent markets. In this research, the authors consider the German (matured market for LI and TPLF) and Indian (nascent market) jurisdictions to identify potential focus areas influencing the growth of litigation risk transfer instruments. With reference to TPLF, this study concludes that while the legal framework is no doubt important in creating a favorable climate for adoption, its growth is influenced by agreement-level factors.
    publisherASCE
    titleLitigation Risk Transfer Mechanisms in Construction Dispute Resolution Process: Cross-Case Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume13
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000486
    journal fristpage04521018-1
    journal lastpage04521018-9
    page9
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2021:;Volume ( 013 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian