YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Framework to Support Data Procurement Strategies for Infrastructure Assets

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2021:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 001::page 05020011-1
    Author:
    Brandon Leo
    ,
    Omar Swei
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000596
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The collection of infrastructure performance data is critical for agencies to cost-effectively maintain and preserve their existing assets. This paper presents a decision-support tool developed to support a state planning agency seeking to select a cost-effective data procurement strategy; specifically, the agency is considering whether to continue collecting and processing infrastructure performance data in-house or outsource to a third-party vendor. The probabilistic tool integrates uncertainty estimation via statistical methods and elicitation of expert judgement with Monte Carlo simulations to compute the probabilistic life-cycle cost of alternative data procurement strategies. For this particular case study, the expected cost to continue data collection and processing activities in-house is higher than the cost to outsource such activities. More importantly, the case study results lead to other important insights and contributions that are more generalizable to other contexts. For example, the labor resources required to collect, process, and maintain infrastructure condition data is the largest driver of total life-cycle costs for in-house data collection. Furthermore, because the decision to outsource data collection is made well before an agency selects a vendor, and such cost estimates are frequently unknown, there is a higher level of uncertainty and potential risk associated with outsourcing these activities. These conclusions, as well as the methods and framework presented in this paper, should assist planning agencies as they develop their data procurement strategy.
    • Download: (336.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Framework to Support Data Procurement Strategies for Infrastructure Assets

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269730
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrandon Leo
    contributor authorOmar Swei
    date accessioned2022-01-31T23:26:37Z
    date available2022-01-31T23:26:37Z
    date issued3/1/2021
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IS.1943-555X.0000596.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269730
    description abstractThe collection of infrastructure performance data is critical for agencies to cost-effectively maintain and preserve their existing assets. This paper presents a decision-support tool developed to support a state planning agency seeking to select a cost-effective data procurement strategy; specifically, the agency is considering whether to continue collecting and processing infrastructure performance data in-house or outsource to a third-party vendor. The probabilistic tool integrates uncertainty estimation via statistical methods and elicitation of expert judgement with Monte Carlo simulations to compute the probabilistic life-cycle cost of alternative data procurement strategies. For this particular case study, the expected cost to continue data collection and processing activities in-house is higher than the cost to outsource such activities. More importantly, the case study results lead to other important insights and contributions that are more generalizable to other contexts. For example, the labor resources required to collect, process, and maintain infrastructure condition data is the largest driver of total life-cycle costs for in-house data collection. Furthermore, because the decision to outsource data collection is made well before an agency selects a vendor, and such cost estimates are frequently unknown, there is a higher level of uncertainty and potential risk associated with outsourcing these activities. These conclusions, as well as the methods and framework presented in this paper, should assist planning agencies as they develop their data procurement strategy.
    publisherASCE
    titleLife-Cycle Cost Analysis Framework to Support Data Procurement Strategies for Infrastructure Assets
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume27
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000596
    journal fristpage05020011-1
    journal lastpage05020011-8
    page8
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2021:;Volume ( 027 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian