YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Application of Random Effects Nonlinear Model for Analyzing Motorized and Nonmotorized Traffic Safety Performance

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 001::page 04020147
    Author:
    Juneyoung Park
    ,
    Mohamed Abdel-Aty
    DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000485
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: In this paper, we investigated the influence of the cross-sectional characteristics of bicycle lanes on motorized and nonmotorized traffic safety. The safety effects of bicycle lanes with different widths were assessed through the estimation of safety performance functions (SPFs) and crash modification factors (CMFs). Four different types of crash prediction models [i.e., generalized linear model (GLM), random effects GLM, generalized nonlinear model (GNM), and random effects GNM] were examined to develop more reliable SPFs. The results indicated that the random effects GNMs provided the most reliable estimates. The goodness of fit was higher for the GNMs than for the GLMs because of the nonlinear relationship between the width of the bicycle lanes and the crash rates. In addition, the random effects models indicated better performance than the GLMs and GNMs. The results indicated that the installation of bicycle lanes is an effective safety measure to reduce four different types of crashes in general. The results of the estimated CMFs using the random effects GNMs indicated that the safety effects of bicycle lanes had nonlinear variations based on different widths. In general, the installation of bicycle lanes with widths of 1.5–1.8 m (5–6 ft) was most effective for reducing motorized crashes, whereas bicycle lanes with widths of 1.8–2.1 m (6–7 ft) were more appropriate for reducing nonmotorized crashes. According to the findings of this study, specific guidance on minimum bicycle lane widths for various roadway characteristics, traffic flows, and roadway types based on empirical evidence regarding traffic safety can be provided.
    • Download: (393.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Application of Random Effects Nonlinear Model for Analyzing Motorized and Nonmotorized Traffic Safety Performance

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269667
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJuneyoung Park
    contributor authorMohamed Abdel-Aty
    date accessioned2022-01-30T22:48:57Z
    date available2022-01-30T22:48:57Z
    date issued1/1/2021
    identifier otherJTEPBS.0000485.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269667
    description abstractIn this paper, we investigated the influence of the cross-sectional characteristics of bicycle lanes on motorized and nonmotorized traffic safety. The safety effects of bicycle lanes with different widths were assessed through the estimation of safety performance functions (SPFs) and crash modification factors (CMFs). Four different types of crash prediction models [i.e., generalized linear model (GLM), random effects GLM, generalized nonlinear model (GNM), and random effects GNM] were examined to develop more reliable SPFs. The results indicated that the random effects GNMs provided the most reliable estimates. The goodness of fit was higher for the GNMs than for the GLMs because of the nonlinear relationship between the width of the bicycle lanes and the crash rates. In addition, the random effects models indicated better performance than the GLMs and GNMs. The results indicated that the installation of bicycle lanes is an effective safety measure to reduce four different types of crashes in general. The results of the estimated CMFs using the random effects GNMs indicated that the safety effects of bicycle lanes had nonlinear variations based on different widths. In general, the installation of bicycle lanes with widths of 1.5–1.8 m (5–6 ft) was most effective for reducing motorized crashes, whereas bicycle lanes with widths of 1.8–2.1 m (6–7 ft) were more appropriate for reducing nonmotorized crashes. According to the findings of this study, specific guidance on minimum bicycle lane widths for various roadway characteristics, traffic flows, and roadway types based on empirical evidence regarding traffic safety can be provided.
    publisherASCE
    titleApplication of Random Effects Nonlinear Model for Analyzing Motorized and Nonmotorized Traffic Safety Performance
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume147
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/JTEPBS.0000485
    journal fristpage04020147
    journal lastpage04020147-8
    page8
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2021:;Volume ( 147 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian