YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Process Mapping of Stakeholders in Transportation Safety Management

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 001::page 04020103
    Author:
    Camille Salem
    ,
    Praveen Vayalamkuzhi
    ,
    Offer Grembek
    ,
    Aditya Medury
    ,
    John L. Ensch
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000875
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The operational reality that dominates organizations can inhibit their ability to document recurring work processes, which is instrumental in defining work responsibilities, incorporating quality assurance, evaluating lead time, eliminating inefficiencies, and developing workforce training requirements. The authors describe the application of process modeling tools to address this problem within a state transportation agency using a set of maps—relationship maps, cross-functional maps, and flowchart maps—in the form of process mapping. This study involved mapping a process used by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to identify high collision concentration locations (HCCLs) across California. Questionnaires, stakeholder interviews, and data assembly across multiple iterations were used, and the outcome includes documentation of the overall process to identify HCCLs, as illustrated in three different maps. Each map indicates a different detail level of the process. In addition to the ability to determine the relationship between entities, the findings include facilitation for improving communication regarding individual roles and responsibilities, as well as opportunities to enhance, modify, and update priority safety programs to better meet the needs of state transportation agencies. Further, the study can potentially aid researchers and practitioners—both inside and outside the transportation sector—to discern the type of map that is most relevant for an analysis of a given process.
    • Download: (2.006Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Process Mapping of Stakeholders in Transportation Safety Management

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269384
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCamille Salem
    contributor authorPraveen Vayalamkuzhi
    contributor authorOffer Grembek
    contributor authorAditya Medury
    contributor authorJohn L. Ensch
    date accessioned2022-01-30T22:40:16Z
    date available2022-01-30T22:40:16Z
    date issued1/1/2021
    identifier other(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000875.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269384
    description abstractThe operational reality that dominates organizations can inhibit their ability to document recurring work processes, which is instrumental in defining work responsibilities, incorporating quality assurance, evaluating lead time, eliminating inefficiencies, and developing workforce training requirements. The authors describe the application of process modeling tools to address this problem within a state transportation agency using a set of maps—relationship maps, cross-functional maps, and flowchart maps—in the form of process mapping. This study involved mapping a process used by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to identify high collision concentration locations (HCCLs) across California. Questionnaires, stakeholder interviews, and data assembly across multiple iterations were used, and the outcome includes documentation of the overall process to identify HCCLs, as illustrated in three different maps. Each map indicates a different detail level of the process. In addition to the ability to determine the relationship between entities, the findings include facilitation for improving communication regarding individual roles and responsibilities, as well as opportunities to enhance, modify, and update priority safety programs to better meet the needs of state transportation agencies. Further, the study can potentially aid researchers and practitioners—both inside and outside the transportation sector—to discern the type of map that is most relevant for an analysis of a given process.
    publisherASCE
    titleProcess Mapping of Stakeholders in Transportation Safety Management
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume37
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000875
    journal fristpage04020103
    journal lastpage04020103-10
    page10
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian