YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Parameter Uncertainty of a Hydrologic Model Calibrated with Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration and Soil Moisture

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 003::page 04020070
    Author:
    Aiswarya Kunnath-Poovakka
    ,
    Dongryeol Ryu
    ,
    T. I. Eldho
    ,
    Biju George
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002055
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Remotely sensed (RS) observations are becoming prevalent for hydrological model calibration in sparsely monitored regions. In this study, the parameter uncertainty associated with a hydrological model calibrated with RS evapotranspiration (ET) and soil moisture (SM) is investigated in detail using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. The daily Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) ReScaled potential ET (CMRSET) and SM retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) are used to calibrate a simplified Australian Water Resource Assessment Landscape (AWRA-L) model at 10 small catchments in Eastern Australia. The study inspects the changes in parameter uncertainty with respect to different RS observations and catchment rainfall conditions and the impact of parameter uncertainty on model predictions. Results suggest that uncertainty in posterior parameter distributions increases from high- to low-rainfall catchments due to the intricate nonlinear relationship between rainfall and runoff in low-yielding catchments. Uncertainty is narrower for ET calibrations than SM calibrations, representing higher uncertainty associated with SM data processing. The study concluded that quantification of parameter uncertainty alone is not enough to provide satisfactory prediction uncertainty.
    • Download: (3.689Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Parameter Uncertainty of a Hydrologic Model Calibrated with Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration and Soil Moisture

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269317
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAiswarya Kunnath-Poovakka
    contributor authorDongryeol Ryu
    contributor authorT. I. Eldho
    contributor authorBiju George
    date accessioned2022-01-30T22:38:14Z
    date available2022-01-30T22:38:14Z
    date issued3/1/2021
    identifier other(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002055.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4269317
    description abstractRemotely sensed (RS) observations are becoming prevalent for hydrological model calibration in sparsely monitored regions. In this study, the parameter uncertainty associated with a hydrological model calibrated with RS evapotranspiration (ET) and soil moisture (SM) is investigated in detail using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach. The daily Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) ReScaled potential ET (CMRSET) and SM retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) are used to calibrate a simplified Australian Water Resource Assessment Landscape (AWRA-L) model at 10 small catchments in Eastern Australia. The study inspects the changes in parameter uncertainty with respect to different RS observations and catchment rainfall conditions and the impact of parameter uncertainty on model predictions. Results suggest that uncertainty in posterior parameter distributions increases from high- to low-rainfall catchments due to the intricate nonlinear relationship between rainfall and runoff in low-yielding catchments. Uncertainty is narrower for ET calibrations than SM calibrations, representing higher uncertainty associated with SM data processing. The study concluded that quantification of parameter uncertainty alone is not enough to provide satisfactory prediction uncertainty.
    publisherASCE
    titleParameter Uncertainty of a Hydrologic Model Calibrated with Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration and Soil Moisture
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume26
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002055
    journal fristpage04020070
    journal lastpage04020070-15
    page15
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2021:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian