Efficacy of Aging Correction for Liquefaction Assessment of Case Histories Recorded during the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes in New Zealand

Abstract

Data from 58 high-quality liquefaction case histories from the Darfield and Christchurch earthquakes are utilized to investigate the efficacy of current liquefaction aging correction procedures. Toward this end, liquefaction case histories are analyzed in which aging corrections are and are not applied, and the resulting predictions are compared to the actual liquefaction response of the deposits. An error-index is calculated to quantify the efficacy of aging corrections. While all the sites located in the Christchurch area are classified as Holocene, based on their geological age, their liquefaction response is influenced more by the geotechnical age of the soil deposits. Aging correction was determined to be beneficial for the liquefaction assessment of soils that experienced recurrent liquefaction (i.e., geotechnical young deposits). However, aging corrections were determined to exacerbate the liquefaction assessment of relatively old (greater than ∼62–580 years) soil deposits.