Comparative Assessment of the Impact of Water Addition either to the Intake Air or in Diesel Emulsion on the Performance and Emissions of a HDDI Diesel EngineSource: Journal of Energy Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 005Author:Efthimios G. Pariotis
,
Theodoros C. Zannis
,
Constantine D. Rakopoulos
,
Dimitrios T. Hountalas
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000697Publisher: ASCE
Abstract: A theoretical investigation is performed to comparatively evaluate the impact of water addition to the intake air (humidification) or in water-diesel fuel emulsion on the performance and emissions in a turbocharged (T/C), heavy-duty direct injection (HDDI) diesel engine. Specifically, three water addition strategies are examined, i.e., intake air humidification, combustion of water-diesel emulsion considering increasing the injector nozzle-hole diameter for keeping constant the injection duration with increasing water content, and combustion of water-diesel emulsion considering a variable injection duration with increasing water content. In all cases, three water percentages were considered: 10%, 20%, and 30% by weight. In all cases examined, the engine brake power output was kept constant corresponding to a speed of 1,800 rpm and to 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of full load, equal to those corresponding to the baseline case without water addition. From the examination of the theoretical results, it is shown that the use of water-fuel emulsion with increased injection duration results in higher cylinder pressures and bulk gas temperatures during the premixed combustion phase compared to the other two water addition strategies, whereas water-fuel emulsion with constant injection duration promotes the intensification of the diffusion combustion phase compared to the other two water induction strategies. The use of both water-fuel emulsion strategies result in a significant reduction of cumulative soot formation rate compared to intake air humidification. Overall, it can be concluded that the use of water-fuel emulsion with constant injection duration can result in a simultaneous increase of brake thermal efficiency and significant reduction of exhaust soot and NO values at both partial and full engine load; thus, it is the most beneficial water addition strategy of those examined in this study.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Efthimios G. Pariotis | |
| contributor author | Theodoros C. Zannis | |
| contributor author | Constantine D. Rakopoulos | |
| contributor author | Dimitrios T. Hountalas | |
| date accessioned | 2022-01-30T21:40:44Z | |
| date available | 2022-01-30T21:40:44Z | |
| date issued | 10/1/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
| identifier other | %28ASCE%29EY.1943-7897.0000697.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268649 | |
| description abstract | A theoretical investigation is performed to comparatively evaluate the impact of water addition to the intake air (humidification) or in water-diesel fuel emulsion on the performance and emissions in a turbocharged (T/C), heavy-duty direct injection (HDDI) diesel engine. Specifically, three water addition strategies are examined, i.e., intake air humidification, combustion of water-diesel emulsion considering increasing the injector nozzle-hole diameter for keeping constant the injection duration with increasing water content, and combustion of water-diesel emulsion considering a variable injection duration with increasing water content. In all cases, three water percentages were considered: 10%, 20%, and 30% by weight. In all cases examined, the engine brake power output was kept constant corresponding to a speed of 1,800 rpm and to 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of full load, equal to those corresponding to the baseline case without water addition. From the examination of the theoretical results, it is shown that the use of water-fuel emulsion with increased injection duration results in higher cylinder pressures and bulk gas temperatures during the premixed combustion phase compared to the other two water addition strategies, whereas water-fuel emulsion with constant injection duration promotes the intensification of the diffusion combustion phase compared to the other two water induction strategies. The use of both water-fuel emulsion strategies result in a significant reduction of cumulative soot formation rate compared to intake air humidification. Overall, it can be concluded that the use of water-fuel emulsion with constant injection duration can result in a simultaneous increase of brake thermal efficiency and significant reduction of exhaust soot and NO values at both partial and full engine load; thus, it is the most beneficial water addition strategy of those examined in this study. | |
| publisher | ASCE | |
| title | Comparative Assessment of the Impact of Water Addition either to the Intake Air or in Diesel Emulsion on the Performance and Emissions of a HDDI Diesel Engine | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 146 | |
| journal issue | 5 | |
| journal title | Journal of Energy Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000697 | |
| page | 16 | |
| tree | Journal of Energy Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 005 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |