YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Cost Performance Comparison of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build for Building and Civil Projects Using Mediation Analysis

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    Hyosoo Moon
    ,
    Kwonhyun Kim
    ,
    Hyun-Soo Lee
    ,
    Moonseo Park
    ,
    Trefor P. Williams
    ,
    Bosik Son
    ,
    Jae-Youl Chun
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001873
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This study analyzes the cost performance of design-build (DB) and design-bid-build (DBB) delivery systems to examine whether one project delivery system (PDS) is always superior to the other when it presents lower cost growth. Previous studies have not yet separated the effects of PDS and third factors on cost performance and have thus been unable to determine the most significant factor affecting cost performance in the comparison of DB and DBB. Bidding characteristics tend to increase project costs during the construction phase and have been recognized as the third factors associated with the PDS and cost performance. The current study employed a causal relationship model, using path analysis to distinguish the effect of the PDS and bidding characteristics on cost performance, to identify the third factors as mediators and to determine whether the mediation effect of bidding characteristics has a statistically significant effect on cost growth. Subsequently, it applied a t-test to compare the cost performance of DB and DBB delivery systems across project types, based on 197 public projects in Seoul, South Korea. The results show that the cost performance of DBB has a mediation effect on architectural building projects but not civil infrastructure projects. It indicates a condition wherein DB should not be considered superior to DBB despite the lower cost growth. Thus, PDS have the potential to be misjudged when their cost-effectiveness is mediated by bidding characteristics. This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing a causal relationship analysis to compare DB and DBB cost performance based on a mediation effect. The findings from the study may guide practitioners in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry to evaluate and select the appropriate PDS for specific project types and provide a method to benchmark DB against DBB.
    • Download: (655.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Cost Performance Comparison of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build for Building and Civil Projects Using Mediation Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268283
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHyosoo Moon
    contributor authorKwonhyun Kim
    contributor authorHyun-Soo Lee
    contributor authorMoonseo Park
    contributor authorTrefor P. Williams
    contributor authorBosik Son
    contributor authorJae-Youl Chun
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:29:00Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:29:00Z
    date issued9/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001873.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268283
    description abstractThis study analyzes the cost performance of design-build (DB) and design-bid-build (DBB) delivery systems to examine whether one project delivery system (PDS) is always superior to the other when it presents lower cost growth. Previous studies have not yet separated the effects of PDS and third factors on cost performance and have thus been unable to determine the most significant factor affecting cost performance in the comparison of DB and DBB. Bidding characteristics tend to increase project costs during the construction phase and have been recognized as the third factors associated with the PDS and cost performance. The current study employed a causal relationship model, using path analysis to distinguish the effect of the PDS and bidding characteristics on cost performance, to identify the third factors as mediators and to determine whether the mediation effect of bidding characteristics has a statistically significant effect on cost growth. Subsequently, it applied a t-test to compare the cost performance of DB and DBB delivery systems across project types, based on 197 public projects in Seoul, South Korea. The results show that the cost performance of DBB has a mediation effect on architectural building projects but not civil infrastructure projects. It indicates a condition wherein DB should not be considered superior to DBB despite the lower cost growth. Thus, PDS have the potential to be misjudged when their cost-effectiveness is mediated by bidding characteristics. This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by providing a causal relationship analysis to compare DB and DBB cost performance based on a mediation effect. The findings from the study may guide practitioners in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry to evaluate and select the appropriate PDS for specific project types and provide a method to benchmark DB against DBB.
    publisherASCE
    titleCost Performance Comparison of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build for Building and Civil Projects Using Mediation Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001873
    page12
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian