YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Modeling Failure of Oil Pipelines

    Source: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2020:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Kimiya Zakikhani
    ,
    Tarek Zayed
    ,
    Bassem Abdrabou
    ,
    Ahmed Senouci
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001368
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: As the safest means of transporting gas and hazardous materials, pipelines transport invaluable petroleum material. However, a considerable number of accidents have happened involving these facilities, leading to economic losses and environmental impacts. Several inspection techniques are used to provide safety for pipelines. Despite their accuracy, these techniques are time-consuming and costly. Some failure prediction and condition assessment models were recently developed to tackle these inefficiencies. However, most of these models only predict one failure source or they rely on subjective expert surveys. This research developed three objective models based on artificial neural network (ANN) and multinominal logit (MNL) regression to predict failure sources in oil pipelines. An ANN model was developed for prediction among mechanical, corrosion, and third-party failures with an average validity percentage (AVP) of 73.7%. Another ANN model was developed for prediction between corrosion or third-party failures with an AVP of 72.8%. In addition, an MNL model was developed for prediction among mechanical, corrosion, and third-party failures with an AVP of 73.7%. Pipeline operators and decision makers can use these models to identify pipeline failure sources. They can also be applied to prioritize in-line inspection to carry out appropriate maintenance.
    • Download: (727.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Modeling Failure of Oil Pipelines

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268195
    Collections
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKimiya Zakikhani
    contributor authorTarek Zayed
    contributor authorBassem Abdrabou
    contributor authorAhmed Senouci
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:26:10Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:26:10Z
    date issued2/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29CF.1943-5509.0001368.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4268195
    description abstractAs the safest means of transporting gas and hazardous materials, pipelines transport invaluable petroleum material. However, a considerable number of accidents have happened involving these facilities, leading to economic losses and environmental impacts. Several inspection techniques are used to provide safety for pipelines. Despite their accuracy, these techniques are time-consuming and costly. Some failure prediction and condition assessment models were recently developed to tackle these inefficiencies. However, most of these models only predict one failure source or they rely on subjective expert surveys. This research developed three objective models based on artificial neural network (ANN) and multinominal logit (MNL) regression to predict failure sources in oil pipelines. An ANN model was developed for prediction among mechanical, corrosion, and third-party failures with an average validity percentage (AVP) of 73.7%. Another ANN model was developed for prediction between corrosion or third-party failures with an AVP of 72.8%. In addition, an MNL model was developed for prediction among mechanical, corrosion, and third-party failures with an AVP of 73.7%. Pipeline operators and decision makers can use these models to identify pipeline failure sources. They can also be applied to prioritize in-line inspection to carry out appropriate maintenance.
    publisherASCE
    titleModeling Failure of Oil Pipelines
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume34
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001368
    page10
    treeJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities:;2020:;Volume ( 034 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian