YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance Assessment Framework for Small Water Systems: Case Study in British Columbia

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Sarin Raj Pokhrel
    ,
    Gyan Chhipi-Shrestha
    ,
    James Hager
    ,
    Manuel J. Rodriguez
    ,
    Kasun Hewage
    ,
    Rehan Sadiq
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001297
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This study presents a performance assessment of small water systems (SWSs) through the lens of drinking water quality management. The performance assessment is based on five criteria: treatment and disinfection; water quality issues; operators’ capabilities; infrastructure and funding; and operational characteristics. Each criterion is composed of six performance indicators. Each indicator is rated using one of the three qualitative classes, namely, good, average, and poor. The qualitative classes are later transformed into numerical scores, which are then aggregated using a weighted sum method. The aggregated scores divided by a maximum possible score in the respective performance criteria give the overall performance level for a particular water system. The proposed performance assessment framework has been demonstrated using data collected from 66 SWSs representing three types of local bodies (regional districts, municipalities, and improvement districts) in British Columbia, Canada. The respondents included operators, engineers, managers, and technicians. The results showed the overall performance level of water systems of regional districts was comparatively better, followed by municipalities, and then improvement districts.
    • Download: (662.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance Assessment Framework for Small Water Systems: Case Study in British Columbia

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267932
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSarin Raj Pokhrel
    contributor authorGyan Chhipi-Shrestha
    contributor authorJames Hager
    contributor authorManuel J. Rodriguez
    contributor authorKasun Hewage
    contributor authorRehan Sadiq
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:17:05Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:17:05Z
    date issued12/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001297.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267932
    description abstractThis study presents a performance assessment of small water systems (SWSs) through the lens of drinking water quality management. The performance assessment is based on five criteria: treatment and disinfection; water quality issues; operators’ capabilities; infrastructure and funding; and operational characteristics. Each criterion is composed of six performance indicators. Each indicator is rated using one of the three qualitative classes, namely, good, average, and poor. The qualitative classes are later transformed into numerical scores, which are then aggregated using a weighted sum method. The aggregated scores divided by a maximum possible score in the respective performance criteria give the overall performance level for a particular water system. The proposed performance assessment framework has been demonstrated using data collected from 66 SWSs representing three types of local bodies (regional districts, municipalities, and improvement districts) in British Columbia, Canada. The respondents included operators, engineers, managers, and technicians. The results showed the overall performance level of water systems of regional districts was comparatively better, followed by municipalities, and then improvement districts.
    publisherASCE
    titlePerformance Assessment Framework for Small Water Systems: Case Study in British Columbia
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001297
    page13
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian