Reservoir Operational Performance Subject to Climate and Management Changes in the Willamette River Basin, OregonSource: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 010DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001280Publisher: ASCE
Abstract: Reevaluation of the reliability of reservoirs in meeting operating objectives is needed as the landscape and operational priorities change. This study examined the individual and collective changes in reservoir performance at the 13 flood regulation projects within the Willamette River Basin (WRB) in Oregon. By applying a scenario-based analysis, derived as part of a broader collaborative modeling project, operational performance was evaluated in response to climate and operational change scenarios. Results indicated that, for the climate scenarios analyzed, primary operating objectives of flood risk reduction and meeting summer biological opinion (BiOp) flow targets were unlikely to be affected. Modest reductions in the ability to fully refill the reservoirs and to meet spring BiOp flow targets were found, particularly under the more severe warming scenario. However, refilling the reservoirs 2 weeks earlier was effective in reducing the storage deficit introduced by climate change without compromising the ability to meet other operational objectives. Drawdown scenarios for maintenance of aging infrastructure had minimal effect at the system scale. While the model was limited by the number of climate scenarios represented and in its ability to represent the full range of variability of this large basin, the results cumulatively suggested that the hydrologic changes associated with the range of climate change examined were not likely to substantially reduce the reliability of the Willamette Project in meeting operational objectives. Where potential deficiencies emerged, they could largely be mitigated through simple operational changes. Instead, it is likely that changes in the sociopolitical landscape (e.g., water rights allocations) and management of water quality (e.g., temperature, harmful algal blooms) will be as or more important than hydrologic changes in reducing reservoir performance in meeting operational objectives.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Desiree Tullos | |
contributor author | Cara Walter | |
contributor author | Kellie Vache | |
date accessioned | 2022-01-30T21:16:29Z | |
date available | 2022-01-30T21:16:29Z | |
date issued | 10/1/2020 12:00:00 AM | |
identifier other | %28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001280.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267915 | |
description abstract | Reevaluation of the reliability of reservoirs in meeting operating objectives is needed as the landscape and operational priorities change. This study examined the individual and collective changes in reservoir performance at the 13 flood regulation projects within the Willamette River Basin (WRB) in Oregon. By applying a scenario-based analysis, derived as part of a broader collaborative modeling project, operational performance was evaluated in response to climate and operational change scenarios. Results indicated that, for the climate scenarios analyzed, primary operating objectives of flood risk reduction and meeting summer biological opinion (BiOp) flow targets were unlikely to be affected. Modest reductions in the ability to fully refill the reservoirs and to meet spring BiOp flow targets were found, particularly under the more severe warming scenario. However, refilling the reservoirs 2 weeks earlier was effective in reducing the storage deficit introduced by climate change without compromising the ability to meet other operational objectives. Drawdown scenarios for maintenance of aging infrastructure had minimal effect at the system scale. While the model was limited by the number of climate scenarios represented and in its ability to represent the full range of variability of this large basin, the results cumulatively suggested that the hydrologic changes associated with the range of climate change examined were not likely to substantially reduce the reliability of the Willamette Project in meeting operational objectives. Where potential deficiencies emerged, they could largely be mitigated through simple operational changes. Instead, it is likely that changes in the sociopolitical landscape (e.g., water rights allocations) and management of water quality (e.g., temperature, harmful algal blooms) will be as or more important than hydrologic changes in reducing reservoir performance in meeting operational objectives. | |
publisher | ASCE | |
title | Reservoir Operational Performance Subject to Climate and Management Changes in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 146 | |
journal issue | 10 | |
journal title | Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001280 | |
page | 14 | |
tree | Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 010 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |