YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Retrofitted Columns

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Cody C. Harrington
    ,
    Abbie B. Liel
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002801
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: In the US, ASCE/SEI 41 serves as the primary standard for the seismic evaluation of existing buildings, as well as for retrofit design. In this study, 3-, 6-, and 9-story nonductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings, designed to the 1967 Uniform Building Code, are retrofitted according to that document’s nonlinear static procedures. For each building, retrofits are designed to meet ASCE 41 collapse prevention (CP), life safety (LS), and immediate occupancy (IO) performance levels by retrofitting vulnerable columns. Multiple column retrofit techniques are considered for each performance level. Once retrofits are designed, the retrofitted buildings are assessed using a nonlinear time history analysis and the framework of performance-based earthquake engineering to quantify seismic performance, collapse risk, and economic losses. These metrics are compared to the stated retrofit performance objectives to evaluate how well the retrofits align with the objectives for the global seismic performance of buildings. The results show that retrofits to IO generally perform as expected, with buildings retaining nearly all their strength and stiffness after design level shaking events and damage concentrating away from the columns that were the target of the retrofits. However, improvements in the nonstructural performance may not be significant without design efforts specifically targeting those components. For retrofits designed to CP and LS, the performance of the retrofitted structures is better than the unretrofit structures but highly variable.
    • Download: (1.107Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Retrofitted Columns

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267702
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCody C. Harrington
    contributor authorAbbie B. Liel
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:07:51Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:07:51Z
    date issued11/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0002801.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267702
    description abstractIn the US, ASCE/SEI 41 serves as the primary standard for the seismic evaluation of existing buildings, as well as for retrofit design. In this study, 3-, 6-, and 9-story nonductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings, designed to the 1967 Uniform Building Code, are retrofitted according to that document’s nonlinear static procedures. For each building, retrofits are designed to meet ASCE 41 collapse prevention (CP), life safety (LS), and immediate occupancy (IO) performance levels by retrofitting vulnerable columns. Multiple column retrofit techniques are considered for each performance level. Once retrofits are designed, the retrofitted buildings are assessed using a nonlinear time history analysis and the framework of performance-based earthquake engineering to quantify seismic performance, collapse risk, and economic losses. These metrics are compared to the stated retrofit performance objectives to evaluate how well the retrofits align with the objectives for the global seismic performance of buildings. The results show that retrofits to IO generally perform as expected, with buildings retaining nearly all their strength and stiffness after design level shaking events and damage concentrating away from the columns that were the target of the retrofits. However, improvements in the nonstructural performance may not be significant without design efforts specifically targeting those components. For retrofits designed to CP and LS, the performance of the retrofitted structures is better than the unretrofit structures but highly variable.
    publisherASCE
    titleEvaluation of Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Retrofitted Columns
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002801
    page14
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian