YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparative Study on Cold-Formed Steel Single-Stud and Multiple-Studs Wall Panels with Magnesium Oxide Sheathing under Axial Loading: Experimental and Analytical

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Chanchal Sonkar
    ,
    A. K. Mittal
    ,
    Sriman Kr. Bhattacharyya
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002723
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: A comprehensive study has been carried out experimentally and analytically on the axial performance of sixteen (16 nos.) cold-formed steel (CFS) wall panels including one bare CFS wall frame, sheathed CFS walls, and single-column stud (with and without sheathing). In the present study, the effect of Magnesium Oxide (MgO) double-layer sheathing on the axial strength of CFS panels (if applied on one-side or both-sides), which has not been addressed before, is investigated in detail. The impacts of various parameters, such as screw spacing, joint detailing, and number of layer of sheathing on axial strength of CFS wall panels have been studied and some important conclusions are drawn. The experimental axial strength of single-stud and multiple-studs CFS wall panel (CFSWP) specimens have also been compared with analytically predicted values. Analytical modeling of CFSWP with MgO board sheathing is carried out by simulating the equivalent stud restraint provided by a screw-sheathing system by considering springs, as specified in some literatures. Thereafter, the constrained and unconstrained finite strip method (CUFSM) Tool version 4.05 is used to carry out an elastic buckling analysis of the stud with sheathing-based springs. Consecutively axial strength of CFSWP has been calculated using the direct strength method (DSM) as per AISI S100 (Appendix 1). The analytical results are found to be in agreement with the experimental results.
    • Download: (6.030Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparative Study on Cold-Formed Steel Single-Stud and Multiple-Studs Wall Panels with Magnesium Oxide Sheathing under Axial Loading: Experimental and Analytical

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267629
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChanchal Sonkar
    contributor authorA. K. Mittal
    contributor authorSriman Kr. Bhattacharyya
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:05:07Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:05:07Z
    date issued11/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0002723.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267629
    description abstractA comprehensive study has been carried out experimentally and analytically on the axial performance of sixteen (16 nos.) cold-formed steel (CFS) wall panels including one bare CFS wall frame, sheathed CFS walls, and single-column stud (with and without sheathing). In the present study, the effect of Magnesium Oxide (MgO) double-layer sheathing on the axial strength of CFS panels (if applied on one-side or both-sides), which has not been addressed before, is investigated in detail. The impacts of various parameters, such as screw spacing, joint detailing, and number of layer of sheathing on axial strength of CFS wall panels have been studied and some important conclusions are drawn. The experimental axial strength of single-stud and multiple-studs CFS wall panel (CFSWP) specimens have also been compared with analytically predicted values. Analytical modeling of CFSWP with MgO board sheathing is carried out by simulating the equivalent stud restraint provided by a screw-sheathing system by considering springs, as specified in some literatures. Thereafter, the constrained and unconstrained finite strip method (CUFSM) Tool version 4.05 is used to carry out an elastic buckling analysis of the stud with sheathing-based springs. Consecutively axial strength of CFSWP has been calculated using the direct strength method (DSM) as per AISI S100 (Appendix 1). The analytical results are found to be in agreement with the experimental results.
    publisherASCE
    titleComparative Study on Cold-Formed Steel Single-Stud and Multiple-Studs Wall Panels with Magnesium Oxide Sheathing under Axial Loading: Experimental and Analytical
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002723
    page22
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian