YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Verification of ASCE 7-16 Pressure Coefficients and Database-Assisted Design of Purlins and Girts Accounting for Wind Directionality

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Dat Duthinh
    ,
    Emil Simiu
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002543
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: For the database-assisted design (DAD) of low-rise building purlins and girts, a method is proposed that explicitly accounts for wind directionality by using directional wind tunnel measurements, directional wind speed data, and publicly available software. The method consists of four steps: (1) assignment of wind loads induced by a unit directional wind speed on purlins and girts from pressure taps and their tributary areas; (2) development of bending moment and shear force influence coefficients for line loads on purlins and girts; (3) multiplication of loads from step 1 by influence coefficients from step 2 and estimation of the peak bending moments and shear forces thus obtained; and (4) use of nonparametric statistics to calculate peak moments and shear forces with a specified mean recurrence interval for various building orientations and accounting for wind directionality. For one example of wind effects on purlins, (1) comparison of the Envelope Method in ASCE 7-16 (taken as 100%) with the most demanding aerodynamic case from wind tunnel tests shows differences ranging between +10% and −25%; and (2) comparison of the ASCE 7-16 method accounting for the wind directionality factor Kd with directional wind loads using nonparametric statistical methods shows differences ranging between +21% and −25%. The unconservatism (+) of ASCE 7-16 is thus worse after Kd is applied. The proposed method is based on the rigorous DAD approach, accounts explicitly for the actual directional wind loading, entails no onerous computational requirements, and typically results in more economical designs while assuring risk-consistent safety.
    • Download: (544.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Verification of ASCE 7-16 Pressure Coefficients and Database-Assisted Design of Purlins and Girts Accounting for Wind Directionality

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267580
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDat Duthinh
    contributor authorEmil Simiu
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:03:30Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:03:30Z
    date issued3/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ST.1943-541X.0002543.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267580
    description abstractFor the database-assisted design (DAD) of low-rise building purlins and girts, a method is proposed that explicitly accounts for wind directionality by using directional wind tunnel measurements, directional wind speed data, and publicly available software. The method consists of four steps: (1) assignment of wind loads induced by a unit directional wind speed on purlins and girts from pressure taps and their tributary areas; (2) development of bending moment and shear force influence coefficients for line loads on purlins and girts; (3) multiplication of loads from step 1 by influence coefficients from step 2 and estimation of the peak bending moments and shear forces thus obtained; and (4) use of nonparametric statistics to calculate peak moments and shear forces with a specified mean recurrence interval for various building orientations and accounting for wind directionality. For one example of wind effects on purlins, (1) comparison of the Envelope Method in ASCE 7-16 (taken as 100%) with the most demanding aerodynamic case from wind tunnel tests shows differences ranging between +10% and −25%; and (2) comparison of the ASCE 7-16 method accounting for the wind directionality factor Kd with directional wind loads using nonparametric statistical methods shows differences ranging between +21% and −25%. The unconservatism (+) of ASCE 7-16 is thus worse after Kd is applied. The proposed method is based on the rigorous DAD approach, accounts explicitly for the actual directional wind loading, entails no onerous computational requirements, and typically results in more economical designs while assuring risk-consistent safety.
    publisherASCE
    titleVerification of ASCE 7-16 Pressure Coefficients and Database-Assisted Design of Purlins and Girts Accounting for Wind Directionality
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002543
    page7
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian