YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    State of Professional Practice for Water Infrastructure Project Delivery

    Source: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Jeffrey Feghaly
    ,
    Mounir El Asmar
    ,
    Samuel T. Ariaratnam
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000500
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Utilities now have a wider selection of project delivery methods to select from based on their project’s unique characteristics and constraints. The objective of this paper is to study alternative project delivery methods (APDM) implementation practices for water infrastructure projects by assessing the state of practice during procurement and execution. Two of the most commonly used APDM, construction management at risk (CMAR) and design-build (DB), are evaluated alongside the traditional design-bid-build (DBB) method. A survey was developed, based on an extensive literature review and support of an industry expert workshop, and collected information from 75 recently completed water and wastewater treatment plant projects. Key findings revealed in this study specific to APDM water infrastructure delivery include (1) guaranteed maximum price (GMP) is the preferred compensation type; (2) qualifications-based is the preferred procurement method; (3) expedited schedule is the highest selection factor; (4) water stakeholders statistically have the lowest comfort level using CMAR; (5) owner involvement in design is lowest for DB projects; and (6) DBB and APDM have similar procurement durations for water infrastructure projects. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge by presenting evidence-based APDM implementation practices that will support utilities with the delivery of their water infrastructure projects.
    • Download: (114.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      State of Professional Practice for Water Infrastructure Project Delivery

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267538
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJeffrey Feghaly
    contributor authorMounir El Asmar
    contributor authorSamuel T. Ariaratnam
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:02:00Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:02:00Z
    date issued8/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29SC.1943-5576.0000500.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267538
    description abstractUtilities now have a wider selection of project delivery methods to select from based on their project’s unique characteristics and constraints. The objective of this paper is to study alternative project delivery methods (APDM) implementation practices for water infrastructure projects by assessing the state of practice during procurement and execution. Two of the most commonly used APDM, construction management at risk (CMAR) and design-build (DB), are evaluated alongside the traditional design-bid-build (DBB) method. A survey was developed, based on an extensive literature review and support of an industry expert workshop, and collected information from 75 recently completed water and wastewater treatment plant projects. Key findings revealed in this study specific to APDM water infrastructure delivery include (1) guaranteed maximum price (GMP) is the preferred compensation type; (2) qualifications-based is the preferred procurement method; (3) expedited schedule is the highest selection factor; (4) water stakeholders statistically have the lowest comfort level using CMAR; (5) owner involvement in design is lowest for DB projects; and (6) DBB and APDM have similar procurement durations for water infrastructure projects. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge by presenting evidence-based APDM implementation practices that will support utilities with the delivery of their water infrastructure projects.
    publisherASCE
    titleState of Professional Practice for Water Infrastructure Project Delivery
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume25
    journal issue3
    journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000500
    page1
    treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2020:;Volume ( 025 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian