YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparative Evaluation of Methods for Removing Residual Mineral Fillers during Bitumen Extraction and Recovery Based on FTIR

    Source: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 032 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Qian Xiang
    ,
    Xiangdao Hou
    ,
    Zifeng Zhao
    ,
    Jorge Prozzi
    ,
    Feipeng Xiao
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003452
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Asphalt extraction and recovery are essential steps before characterizing components and properties of aged asphalt binders for recycling the reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). To accurately analyze the aged asphalt, it is essential to evaluate removal efficiency of residual mineral fillers during bitumen extraction and recovery. This study investigated three methods (filtration, gravitational sedimentation, and centrifugal sedimentation) to separate base asphalt and styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS)-modified asphalt from the mineral fillers using trichloroethylene (TCE) solvent. The removal efficiency was quantitatively evaluated by the index of silicon–oxygen bond based on Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Furthermore, comparative evaluation and consumption analysis were carried out to assess removal efficiency and energy consumption of the three methods. The results demonstrated that centrifugal sedimentation was the best way to get the cleanest asphalt binder, while gravitational sedimentation was superior in terms of removal efficiency, and thus it can be used to obtain larger amounts of the “pure” aged asphalt for macrotest. The removal efficiencies of the three methods were affected by the types of asphalt and concentrations of the asphalt-trichloroethylene solutions.
    • Download: (2.030Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparative Evaluation of Methods for Removing Residual Mineral Fillers during Bitumen Extraction and Recovery Based on FTIR

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267388
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorQian Xiang
    contributor authorXiangdao Hou
    contributor authorZifeng Zhao
    contributor authorJorge Prozzi
    contributor authorFeipeng Xiao
    date accessioned2022-01-30T20:56:38Z
    date available2022-01-30T20:56:38Z
    date issued12/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29MT.1943-5533.0003452.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267388
    description abstractAsphalt extraction and recovery are essential steps before characterizing components and properties of aged asphalt binders for recycling the reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). To accurately analyze the aged asphalt, it is essential to evaluate removal efficiency of residual mineral fillers during bitumen extraction and recovery. This study investigated three methods (filtration, gravitational sedimentation, and centrifugal sedimentation) to separate base asphalt and styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS)-modified asphalt from the mineral fillers using trichloroethylene (TCE) solvent. The removal efficiency was quantitatively evaluated by the index of silicon–oxygen bond based on Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Furthermore, comparative evaluation and consumption analysis were carried out to assess removal efficiency and energy consumption of the three methods. The results demonstrated that centrifugal sedimentation was the best way to get the cleanest asphalt binder, while gravitational sedimentation was superior in terms of removal efficiency, and thus it can be used to obtain larger amounts of the “pure” aged asphalt for macrotest. The removal efficiencies of the three methods were affected by the types of asphalt and concentrations of the asphalt-trichloroethylene solutions.
    publisherASCE
    titleComparative Evaluation of Methods for Removing Residual Mineral Fillers during Bitumen Extraction and Recovery Based on FTIR
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume32
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003452
    page10
    treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 032 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian