YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    How Sensation-Seeking Propensity Determines Individuals’ Risk-Taking Behaviors: Implication of Risk Compensation in a Simulated Roofing Task

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Sogand Hasanzadeh
    ,
    Jesus M. de la Garza
    ,
    E. Scott Geller
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000813
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Risk compensation theory attempts to explain why and how workers modify their risk-taking behaviors in response to the level of safety intervention they receive. One ramification of this theory is that dispositional factors—such as sensation-seeking propensity—may contribute to the likelihood and nature of behavioral adaptations to safety interventions. Accordingly, this paper discusses a mixed-reality roofing simulation that explored sensation-seeking propensity as a determinant of individuals’ risk-taking behavior. Three increasing levels of safety interventions (i.e., no intervention, injury-reducing intervention, and injury-preventing intervention) served as the experimental manipulations. Participant’s motions, risk-taking behaviors, and risk perceptions were monitored using real-time location-tracking sensors and semistructured interviews. Collectively, the results demonstrated that risk propensity (in terms of sensation-seeking disposition) moderated the relationship between providing safety interventions and risk-taking behaviors. While participants in this study took significantly more risks when protected with a safety intervention—thereby demonstrating risk compensation due to a greater decline in perceived level of risk—those with a high sensation-seeking propensity especially adapted their behaviors to offset safety gains intended by interventions. Thus, individuals scoring high in sensation-seeking appear to form a unique high-risk propensity group of subjects. While students acting as unskilled roofing workers were recruited for this study, the findings provided an initial empirical understanding of how more safety protections might implicitly signal subjects with high-risk propensity to take additional risks and behave in riskier fashion without perceiving their behavior to be risky. This paper reveals the need to provide participants scoring high in sensation-seeking with injury-prevention interventions to counteract their excessive risk-taking and risk compensation behavior.
    • Download: (1.213Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      How Sensation-Seeking Propensity Determines Individuals’ Risk-Taking Behaviors: Implication of Risk Compensation in a Simulated Roofing Task

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267111
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSogand Hasanzadeh
    contributor authorJesus M. de la Garza
    contributor authorE. Scott Geller
    date accessioned2022-01-30T20:47:04Z
    date available2022-01-30T20:47:04Z
    date issued9/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000813.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267111
    description abstractRisk compensation theory attempts to explain why and how workers modify their risk-taking behaviors in response to the level of safety intervention they receive. One ramification of this theory is that dispositional factors—such as sensation-seeking propensity—may contribute to the likelihood and nature of behavioral adaptations to safety interventions. Accordingly, this paper discusses a mixed-reality roofing simulation that explored sensation-seeking propensity as a determinant of individuals’ risk-taking behavior. Three increasing levels of safety interventions (i.e., no intervention, injury-reducing intervention, and injury-preventing intervention) served as the experimental manipulations. Participant’s motions, risk-taking behaviors, and risk perceptions were monitored using real-time location-tracking sensors and semistructured interviews. Collectively, the results demonstrated that risk propensity (in terms of sensation-seeking disposition) moderated the relationship between providing safety interventions and risk-taking behaviors. While participants in this study took significantly more risks when protected with a safety intervention—thereby demonstrating risk compensation due to a greater decline in perceived level of risk—those with a high sensation-seeking propensity especially adapted their behaviors to offset safety gains intended by interventions. Thus, individuals scoring high in sensation-seeking appear to form a unique high-risk propensity group of subjects. While students acting as unskilled roofing workers were recruited for this study, the findings provided an initial empirical understanding of how more safety protections might implicitly signal subjects with high-risk propensity to take additional risks and behave in riskier fashion without perceiving their behavior to be risky. This paper reveals the need to provide participants scoring high in sensation-seeking with injury-prevention interventions to counteract their excessive risk-taking and risk compensation behavior.
    publisherASCE
    titleHow Sensation-Seeking Propensity Determines Individuals’ Risk-Taking Behaviors: Implication of Risk Compensation in a Simulated Roofing Task
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume36
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000813
    page15
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian