YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    How Design Standardization CSFs Can Impact Project Performance of Capital Projects

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Binit K. Shrestha
    ,
    Jin Ouk Choi
    ,
    Young Hoon Kwak
    ,
    Jennifer S. Shane
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000792
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Standardization is a commonplace idea today; however, capital projects have not been able to achieve high levels of facility design standardization. The Construction Industry Institute (CII) identified 15 standardization critical success factors (CSFs) for capital projects, particularly the upstream, midstream, and mining sector, to help the practitioners achieve higher levels of facility design standardization in capital projects. However, there is a need to better understand the CSFs comprehensively by analyzing data from actual standardized projects. To fill this gap, this study examined CSFs’ degrees of accomplishment, as well as project performance scores for different metrics, and have analyzed a correlation between CSFs’ accomplishment and the project performance of 43 projects. The results show that the more standardization CSFs are accomplished, the better the project performances. This research also identified which CSFs are commonly accomplished and which CSFs are challenging to accomplish by analyzing the degree of accomplishment of each CSF. The results show that Basic Engineering Design Data, Operations and Maintenance, Technology Maturity, and Experience and Capability of Project Team are the CSFs that are more commonly accomplished, whereas Constructability of Standardization and Feasibility Analysis of Standardization are the CSFs that the industry finds difficult to accomplish. The research findings will help the industry to understand better the importance of the CSFs, which will lead them to achieve better project performance for capital projects.
    • Download: (1.110Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      How Design Standardization CSFs Can Impact Project Performance of Capital Projects

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267097
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBinit K. Shrestha
    contributor authorJin Ouk Choi
    contributor authorYoung Hoon Kwak
    contributor authorJennifer S. Shane
    date accessioned2022-01-30T20:46:38Z
    date available2022-01-30T20:46:38Z
    date issued7/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29ME.1943-5479.0000792.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267097
    description abstractStandardization is a commonplace idea today; however, capital projects have not been able to achieve high levels of facility design standardization. The Construction Industry Institute (CII) identified 15 standardization critical success factors (CSFs) for capital projects, particularly the upstream, midstream, and mining sector, to help the practitioners achieve higher levels of facility design standardization in capital projects. However, there is a need to better understand the CSFs comprehensively by analyzing data from actual standardized projects. To fill this gap, this study examined CSFs’ degrees of accomplishment, as well as project performance scores for different metrics, and have analyzed a correlation between CSFs’ accomplishment and the project performance of 43 projects. The results show that the more standardization CSFs are accomplished, the better the project performances. This research also identified which CSFs are commonly accomplished and which CSFs are challenging to accomplish by analyzing the degree of accomplishment of each CSF. The results show that Basic Engineering Design Data, Operations and Maintenance, Technology Maturity, and Experience and Capability of Project Team are the CSFs that are more commonly accomplished, whereas Constructability of Standardization and Feasibility Analysis of Standardization are the CSFs that the industry finds difficult to accomplish. The research findings will help the industry to understand better the importance of the CSFs, which will lead them to achieve better project performance for capital projects.
    publisherASCE
    titleHow Design Standardization CSFs Can Impact Project Performance of Capital Projects
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume36
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000792
    page7
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 036 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian