YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Model for Earthquake Damage Analysis in Lifeline Utility Systems with Consideration of Uncertainties

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2020:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 003
    Author:
    Mohammad Eskandari
    ,
    Babak Omidvar
    ,
    Mahdi Modiri
    ,
    Mohammad Ali Nekooie
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000547
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Considering the uncertain performance of lifelines with respect to earthquakes, the seismic assessment of critical infrastructures is of the utmost importance. The main purpose of this paper is to develop a model for critical infrastructures, with consideration of the uncertainties in a seismic damage analysis, using the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) methods. Accordingly, a system is designed, based on the geo-spatial information system to analyze the spatial data by the seismic hazard analysis, vulnerability assessment, and seismic damage analysis of critical infrastructures, including water, power, gas, and oil networks. In addition to the probabilistic based methods, the one-loop (1L) method also has been used to evaluate the damage analysis without considering the uncertainty. The estimated results from various methods have been compared, and it is concluded that the estimated peak ground acceleration (PGA) values are high in the central areas of the desired case study. Moreover, the permanent ground displacement (PGD) due to lateral spreading using the 1L method is higher than the estimated values based on MCS and LHS approaches. The outcomes based on the 1L method are within the range of 0–0.762 m and within the range of 0–0.381 m for MCS and LHS approaches. However, damages from MCS and LHS are equivalent, according to the Mann-Whitney test.
    • Download: (1.623Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Model for Earthquake Damage Analysis in Lifeline Utility Systems with Consideration of Uncertainties

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267020
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMohammad Eskandari
    contributor authorBabak Omidvar
    contributor authorMahdi Modiri
    contributor authorMohammad Ali Nekooie
    date accessioned2022-01-30T20:44:05Z
    date available2022-01-30T20:44:05Z
    date issued9/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IS.1943-555X.0000547.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267020
    description abstractConsidering the uncertain performance of lifelines with respect to earthquakes, the seismic assessment of critical infrastructures is of the utmost importance. The main purpose of this paper is to develop a model for critical infrastructures, with consideration of the uncertainties in a seismic damage analysis, using the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) methods. Accordingly, a system is designed, based on the geo-spatial information system to analyze the spatial data by the seismic hazard analysis, vulnerability assessment, and seismic damage analysis of critical infrastructures, including water, power, gas, and oil networks. In addition to the probabilistic based methods, the one-loop (1L) method also has been used to evaluate the damage analysis without considering the uncertainty. The estimated results from various methods have been compared, and it is concluded that the estimated peak ground acceleration (PGA) values are high in the central areas of the desired case study. Moreover, the permanent ground displacement (PGD) due to lateral spreading using the 1L method is higher than the estimated values based on MCS and LHS approaches. The outcomes based on the 1L method are within the range of 0–0.762 m and within the range of 0–0.381 m for MCS and LHS approaches. However, damages from MCS and LHS are equivalent, according to the Mann-Whitney test.
    publisherASCE
    titleModel for Earthquake Damage Analysis in Lifeline Utility Systems with Consideration of Uncertainties
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume26
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000547
    page14
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2020:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian