YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Measuring Transportation Infrastructure Resilience: Case Study with Amtrak

    Source: Journal of Infrastructure Systems:;2020:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Gina Tonn
    ,
    Jeffrey Czajkowski
    ,
    Howard Kunreuther
    ,
    Kara Angotti
    ,
    Karen Gelman
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000526
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: This paper describes a case study performed with the US passenger rail service provider Amtrak that developed a metrics framework to measure resilience to climate risk within their Northeast Corridor operations systems and to track changes in resilience over time. Amtrak representatives reviewed metrics and selected those most relevant and also most feasible to measure and implement at Amtrak. Twenty-one metrics, termed resilience activities, focused on technical and organizational (leadership and readiness) resilience; key outcomes to measure following a disruption were identified as cost, safety, customer satisfaction, organizational development, and on-time performance. Resilience activities were scored to serve as a baseline for assessing resilience in the future. While many researchers have generated frameworks or resilience metrics, few published examples of metrics implementation in infrastructure systems are available. Amtrak appears to be progressive in their use of resilience metrics and participated in this process to improve resilience awareness within their organization and identify areas for improvement. Analysis of baseline scoring of resilience activities indicates that Amtrak assesses itself as being relatively more resilient toward climate change risk from an organizational readiness capacity than from an organizational leadership capacity or a technical capacity. Future research may include the tracking of metrics following a disruption and a periodic reassessment of resilience activity scores.
    • Download: (450.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Measuring Transportation Infrastructure Resilience: Case Study with Amtrak

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267014
    Collections
    • Journal of Infrastructure Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGina Tonn
    contributor authorJeffrey Czajkowski
    contributor authorHoward Kunreuther
    contributor authorKara Angotti
    contributor authorKaren Gelman
    date accessioned2022-01-30T20:43:45Z
    date available2022-01-30T20:43:45Z
    date issued3/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IS.1943-555X.0000526.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267014
    description abstractThis paper describes a case study performed with the US passenger rail service provider Amtrak that developed a metrics framework to measure resilience to climate risk within their Northeast Corridor operations systems and to track changes in resilience over time. Amtrak representatives reviewed metrics and selected those most relevant and also most feasible to measure and implement at Amtrak. Twenty-one metrics, termed resilience activities, focused on technical and organizational (leadership and readiness) resilience; key outcomes to measure following a disruption were identified as cost, safety, customer satisfaction, organizational development, and on-time performance. Resilience activities were scored to serve as a baseline for assessing resilience in the future. While many researchers have generated frameworks or resilience metrics, few published examples of metrics implementation in infrastructure systems are available. Amtrak appears to be progressive in their use of resilience metrics and participated in this process to improve resilience awareness within their organization and identify areas for improvement. Analysis of baseline scoring of resilience activities indicates that Amtrak assesses itself as being relatively more resilient toward climate change risk from an organizational readiness capacity than from an organizational leadership capacity or a technical capacity. Future research may include the tracking of metrics following a disruption and a periodic reassessment of resilience activity scores.
    publisherASCE
    titleMeasuring Transportation Infrastructure Resilience: Case Study with Amtrak
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume26
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000526
    page11
    treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2020:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian