YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Removal Comparison and Cost Evaluation of 2,6-Dichlorophenol

    Source: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2020:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Anshu Yadav
    ,
    Vinita Khandegar
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000530
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: In this study, 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,6-DCP), 5 mg/L was targeted as a priority pollutant and removed using chemical coagulation (CC), adsorption (AD), and electrocoagulation (EC) processes. Aluminum sulfate (AS) and ferrous sulfate (FS) were used as coagulant and adsorbent in CC and AD respectively, while EC experiments were performed in an electrolytic cell using aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) electrodes. The effects of various process parameters, including pH, process time, agitation speed, dose, and operating cost, were investigated. The results indicated that AS showed better removal efficiency than FS in all the process. The overall results of the study showed that 2,6-DCP removal efficiency (PRE) is parameter-dependent for each process. Maximum PRE for AS (75%, 76%, and 98%) and for FS (68%, 70%, and 89%) was achieved in CC, AD, and EC processes, respectively, at an adsorbent dosage of 4 g. A comparative study of CC, AD, and EC showed that conventional treatment processes (CC and AD) displayed less efficiency with long process times and were highly dependent on solution pH. In EC treatment; fewer chemicals were used and high efficiency was obtained. Therefore, it can be concluded that all the three process can be used in series for removal of phenol at low operating cost.
    • Download: (1.775Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Removal Comparison and Cost Evaluation of 2,6-Dichlorophenol

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266944
    Collections
    • Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAnshu Yadav
    contributor authorVinita Khandegar
    date accessioned2022-01-30T20:41:20Z
    date available2022-01-30T20:41:20Z
    date issued10/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29HZ.2153-5515.0000530.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266944
    description abstractIn this study, 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,6-DCP), 5 mg/L was targeted as a priority pollutant and removed using chemical coagulation (CC), adsorption (AD), and electrocoagulation (EC) processes. Aluminum sulfate (AS) and ferrous sulfate (FS) were used as coagulant and adsorbent in CC and AD respectively, while EC experiments were performed in an electrolytic cell using aluminum (Al) and iron (Fe) electrodes. The effects of various process parameters, including pH, process time, agitation speed, dose, and operating cost, were investigated. The results indicated that AS showed better removal efficiency than FS in all the process. The overall results of the study showed that 2,6-DCP removal efficiency (PRE) is parameter-dependent for each process. Maximum PRE for AS (75%, 76%, and 98%) and for FS (68%, 70%, and 89%) was achieved in CC, AD, and EC processes, respectively, at an adsorbent dosage of 4 g. A comparative study of CC, AD, and EC showed that conventional treatment processes (CC and AD) displayed less efficiency with long process times and were highly dependent on solution pH. In EC treatment; fewer chemicals were used and high efficiency was obtained. Therefore, it can be concluded that all the three process can be used in series for removal of phenol at low operating cost.
    publisherASCE
    titleRemoval Comparison and Cost Evaluation of 2,6-Dichlorophenol
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000530
    page7
    treeJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2020:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian