YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Accuracy Assessment of DEMs in Different Topographic Complexity Based on an Optimum Number of GCP Formulation and Error Propagation Analysis

    Source: Journal of Surveying Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Saeed Nadi
    ,
    Davood Shojaei
    ,
    Yusof Ghiasi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000296
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: One of the main concerns during digital elevation model (DEM) evaluation is the number of ground control points (GCP). Accordingly, in this paper, a new method is proposed for calculating the appropriate number of GCPs for DEM evaluation based on a confidence interval (CI) of the root-mean-square error (RMSE). This method was employed to determine the CI of the estimated vertical accuracy of Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) World 3D-30m (AW3D30), Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) Free 30 m resolution global DEMs in mountainous, hilly, flat, and urban regions of two study areas. To provide a more reliable estimation of errors, robust statistical methods, including median, normalized median absolute deviation (NMAD), and Huber’s μ and σ were also investigated. Furthermore, a new formulation was developed to analyze the propagation of the errors in the slope and aspect products of DEM. The results showed that, to evaluate the accuracy of AW3D30, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM with a CI of ±1  m and the probability of 99%, in the study area, a minimum number of 2,110, 1,483 and 750 GCPs are required, respectively. The results also showed that, in the flat, hilly, and mountainous study areas, AW3D30 was the most accurate DEM. However, SRTM fit better to the urban study area. Finally, the results of the error propagation analysis illustrated that the slope and aspect errors bore a striking relation to the surface gradient.
    • Download: (1.869Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Accuracy Assessment of DEMs in Different Topographic Complexity Based on an Optimum Number of GCP Formulation and Error Propagation Analysis

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266727
    Collections
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSaeed Nadi
    contributor authorDavood Shojaei
    contributor authorYusof Ghiasi
    date accessioned2022-01-30T20:13:53Z
    date available2022-01-30T20:13:53Z
    date issued2020
    identifier other%28ASCE%29SU.1943-5428.0000296.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4266727
    description abstractOne of the main concerns during digital elevation model (DEM) evaluation is the number of ground control points (GCP). Accordingly, in this paper, a new method is proposed for calculating the appropriate number of GCPs for DEM evaluation based on a confidence interval (CI) of the root-mean-square error (RMSE). This method was employed to determine the CI of the estimated vertical accuracy of Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) World 3D-30m (AW3D30), Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), and Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) Free 30 m resolution global DEMs in mountainous, hilly, flat, and urban regions of two study areas. To provide a more reliable estimation of errors, robust statistical methods, including median, normalized median absolute deviation (NMAD), and Huber’s μ and σ were also investigated. Furthermore, a new formulation was developed to analyze the propagation of the errors in the slope and aspect products of DEM. The results showed that, to evaluate the accuracy of AW3D30, ASTER GDEM, and SRTM with a CI of ±1  m and the probability of 99%, in the study area, a minimum number of 2,110, 1,483 and 750 GCPs are required, respectively. The results also showed that, in the flat, hilly, and mountainous study areas, AW3D30 was the most accurate DEM. However, SRTM fit better to the urban study area. Finally, the results of the error propagation analysis illustrated that the slope and aspect errors bore a striking relation to the surface gradient.
    publisherASCE
    titleAccuracy Assessment of DEMs in Different Topographic Complexity Based on an Optimum Number of GCP Formulation and Error Propagation Analysis
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000296
    page04019019
    treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian